Holy Bishops in Late Antiquity. Claudia Rapp

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ in a magisterial study by Irénée Hausherr.⁹⁴ Back in the fourth century, Abba Macarius, who himself had been a disciple of Anthony, gave this advice to another desert dweller: “Flee from men, stay in your cell, weep for your sins, do not take pleasure in the conversation of men, and you will be saved.”⁹⁵ Heartfelt penance, the monks knew well, could blot out sin. The flow of tears could have the same cleansing effect as the baptismal font. Nilus of Ancyra advises on the solitary life: “Consider fasting a weapon, prayer a wall, and tears a wash basin.”⁹⁶ In a sermon on the theme of the baptism of Christ, delivered on the Feast of Epiphany in the year 381, Gregory of Nazianzus reminded his congregation that penance constitutes a form of baptism:

      I know of a fifth [kind of baptism] also, which is that of tears, and is much more laborious, received by him who washes his bed every night and his couch with tears; whose bruises stink through his wickedness; and who goeth mourning and of a sad countenance; who imitates the repentance of Manasseh and the humiliation of the Ninerites upon which God had mercy; who utters the words of the Publican in the Temple, and is justified rather than the stiffnecked Pharisee; who like the Canaanite woman bends down and asks for mercy and crumbs, the food of a dog that is very hungry.⁹⁷

      Anastasius Sinaites expressed the same idea, but in fewer words: “Tears are the true bath of the Christian.”⁹⁸ His Questions and Answers provide us with a rare glimpse of Egyptian monastic spirituality in the late seventh century, long after the heyday of the monastic settlements in Kellia and Nitria. Elsewhere, he illustrated this point with the story of the tear-soaked handkerchief of a robber that blotted out his heinous deeds.⁹⁹ Such tears of repentance over concrete actions could move God’s forgiveness. Tears were also shed out of a general sense of humility and the recognition of one’s sinful nature. This is the advice of Evagrius Ponticus, the great theologian of Egyptian monastic spirituality in the fourth century:

      When you are of the mind that you do not stand in need of tears for your sins along with your prayer, then give some thought to the distance that separates you from God, whereas you ought to be in him constantly. Then you will shed more abundant tears than ever.¹⁰⁰

      Evagrius knew that the shedding of tears was a very special gift. It was prized so highly that he even had to warn those who were able to weep copiously against becoming boastful of their ability.¹⁰¹

      Intercessory Prayer by Holy Men

      Weeping and prayer were intimately connected. Weeping was the outward gesture that accompanied fervent prayer for the remission of sins. In Evagrius’s words: “Pray with tears and your request will find a hearing. Nothing so gratifies the Lord as supplication offered in the midst of tears.”¹⁰² Those who had, through long experience, reached a certain degree of perfection were capable of praying (and weeping) not only for themselves, but also for others. An inscription at the monastic site of Saqqara in Egypt records: “This is the spot on which our lord and father Apa Jeremias bowed himself, until he removed the sins of the people of the whole world. May his (?) holy blessing descend upon us. Amen Amen, so be it, Amen (?).”¹⁰³

      The ability of holy men to pray for others was highly valued by their contemporaries and certainly contributed to their popularity.¹⁰⁴ Holy men and pneumatophoroi were expected to pray on behalf of those in need of assistance. ¹⁰⁵ The spiritual fathers whom we encountered in the documentary evidence discussed above may have performed fewer miracles than the sensationalistic hagiographical record of late antiquity would lead us to expect from holy men, but they did offer up prayers for their correspondents. In some instances, they even gave assurance for the forgiveness of sins or promised their help to alleviate the burden of the sins of their followers. The life of retreat in prayer was very different from that of asceticism and almsgiving, and an apa who decided to embark exclusively on this path could meet with the consternation of his monastic colleagues. This is what happened to Apa Banes, according to an apophthegma preserved in the Coptic collection. The monks were so irritated at Banes’ rejection of the lifestyle they held dear that they needed the reassurance of the local prophet Abraham:

      Why do you trouble yourselves? In fact, during the time when Apa Banes distributed alms, did he nourish a village, a town, a county? Now, Banes is able to raise both hands [in prayer] to make sure that barley comes to the whole world in abundance. He is also able to ask God to forgive the sins of this entire generation.¹⁰⁶

      The ability of holy men to pray for others is a recurring theme in the monastic literature of late antiquity, where it usually serves the dual purpose of underlining their compassion for others, which motivates their prayer, and of emphasizing their advanced state of holiness, which guarantees its success. Miracles were often, but not always the result.

      In hagiography, the holy man’s intercession on behalf of sinners is usually couched in colorful stories that culminate in a miracle.¹⁰⁷ Typically, a sinner who had suffered divine punishment for a misdeed—in the form of paralysis, sudden voice loss, or some other ominous occurrence—approached the holy man with the request to be “loosed” by him. This is exemplified in the story of the prominent Ishmaelite who broke his vow to God to abstain from meat, and then found that the bird he had shot and was about to eat had turned into stone. In his shock and distress, he appealed to Symeon the Stylite, who had been instrumental in his conversion, and asked “that through his all-powerful prayers he [Symeon] might free him from the bonds of sin.”¹⁰⁸

      The necessity to remain in communication with God through prayer was so much taken for granted that there is little theoretical reflection on the nature of prayer itself. An exception is John Cassian, who had spent many years with the fathers in Egypt. Not long after his return to the West in 404, he founded a men’s and a women’s monastery in Marseilles where he composed his Institutes and Conferences to communicate his experience to a Latin readership, becoming the first to translate the monastic ideal to the West. Cassian made a distinction between four different kinds of prayer—supplication, prayer, pleading, and thanksgiving. He lists them in ascending order, each correlated with the spiritual state of the individual:

      These, then, are the four rich sources of prayer. Out of contrition for sin is supplication born. Prayer comes of the fidelity to promises and the fulfillment of what we have undertaken for the sake of a pure conscience. Pleading comes forth from the warmth of our love. Thanksgiving is generated by the contemplation of God’s goodness and greatness and faithfulness. [. . .] The first type seems especially appropriate for beginners, for they are still goaded by the stings and by the memory of past sin. The second type is appropriate for those who are making progress in the acquisition of virtue and in the exaltedness of their souls. The third is suitable for those who live as they have promised to do, who see the frailty of others and who speak out for them because of the charity that moves them. The fourth suits those who have pulled the painful thorn of penitence out of their hearts and who in the quiet of their purified spirit contemplate the kindness and mercy that the Lord has shown them in the past, that He gives them now and that He makes ready for them in the future. Aflame with all this their hearts are rapt in the burning prayer which human words can neither grasp nor utter. Sometimes the soul which has come to be rooted in this state of real purity takes on all the forms of prayer at the same time. It flies from one to the other, like an uncontrollable grasping fire. It becomes an outpouring of living pure prayer which the Holy Spirit, without our knowing it, lifts up to God in unspeakable groanings. . . . In no way can our spirit attain those more exalted modes of prayer of which I have been speaking except by the step-by-step journey upward through all those pleas we pour forth.¹⁰⁹

      Cassian derived this four-part scheme of supplications, prayers, intercessions, and thanksgivings from Paul’s First Letter to Timothy (1 Tim. 2:1). Origen had already commented on this passage in his On Prayer. He noted that prayer on behalf of others or for specific things (enteuxis) was incumbent upon those who had greater parrhēsia, access to God.¹¹⁰ However, the hierarchical arrangement of all four kinds of prayer and the correspondence of each of them to a particular СКАЧАТЬ