Steve Magnante's 1001 Corvette Facts. Steve Magnante
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Steve Magnante's 1001 Corvette Facts - Steve Magnante страница 8

Название: Steve Magnante's 1001 Corvette Facts

Автор: Steve Magnante

Издательство: Ingram

Жанр: Автомобили и ПДД

Серия:

isbn: 9781613254561

isbn:

СКАЧАТЬ

      68 Despite its inline 6-cylinder engine, Earl’s stylists added a touch of V-8 imagery to the 1953 Corvette’s tail by splitting the exhaust system and capping the dual outlets with chrome tips. Although some inline 6-cylinder cars of the mid-1950s (certain low-line Studebakers) emulated dual exhaust tips with stylized rear bumpers incorporating a second dummy outlet, the Corvette dual exhaust tracts were real and fully effective.

      69 With use, owners of 1953 Corvettes noticed their cars’ 1-inch tailpipe extensions sucked exhaust fumes into the cabin and deposited soot around the trunk. A remedy appeared midway through the 1954 production run when the length of the tips was extended to a full 4 inches. The extended tips were implemented on 1,523 of the 3,640 roadsters built in 1954 and on all 700 cars built in 1955.

The Corvette featured...

       The Corvette featured these slim 1-inch-long exhaust tips in 1953-on in just under half of the cars built in 1954. The 4-inch-long replacements solved exhaust fuming and staining problems.

      70 Through the years, Corvettes have worn many legendary external engine-callout emblems. The first arrived in 1955 on 265-ci V-8 cars. To tell the world a V-8 was on board, the standard diecast chrome Corvette fender emblems were enhanced with an oversized, gold-toned “V” applied atop the small V in the Corvette nameplate. Interestingly, the chromed die-cast metal inscriptions were the same items used in 1953 and 1954. The enlarged V was an add-on component. Removing it revealed a standard 6-cylinder emblem with the smaller, integral V.

      71 Although it might be easy to make the assumption, the Ardun Mechanical Corporation was not the source of the Duntov cam that grabbed headlines at the 1956 Daytona Speed Week. There, a preproduction Corvette ran a two-way average of 150.583 mph with Arkus-Duntov himself at the wheel. With its .404/.413-inch valve lift, this solid cam was available as Regular Production Option (RPO) number 449 and helped unlock the 265-ci small-block V-8’s breathing potential. The Duntov nomenclature was assigned to the cam because he designed it while he was a GM employee. For a decade afterward, hobbyists loosely applied the term “Duntov cam” to describe small-block Chevy cams with hotter-than-stock specifications. After a decade of (mostly) misuse, the term has passed from the popular lexicon of today, except when used to describe a correctly restored early Corvette equipped with RPO 449. Beyond that, the Ardun Mechanical Corporation was no longer active when General Motors released the cam in 1956. A few years later, at Pontiac, engine development engineer Malcolm “Mac” McKellar was immortalized when a series of his camshaft designs were celebrated with his last name attached.

      72 The Corvette’s low, sloping nose and hood line forced the use of a special water pump on 6-cylinder models. To allow clearance between the fan blades and hood underside, the cast-iron pump housing was designed to position the fan pulley shaft’s horizontal axis lower than the pumps used in any other Chevrolet model. Today, reproduction housings are available, but the laws of supply and demand set the price at almost $2,000. Rebuilt original pumps can run as high as $3,000.

      73 Tire spin was a problem for racers and overly enthusiastic street drivers thanks to the open-style differential fitted to all 1953–1955 Corvettes. Although Positraction was not officially added to Corvette’s option list until 1957 (a $48.45 upcharge), a handful of Posi cars trickled out in 1956.

      74 The 265 V-8 of 1955 was big news, but like 1953 and 1954, less sporty Powerglide automatic transmissions dominated production. Records show that between 70 and 80 of the 700 Corvettes built in 1955 received 3-speed manual transmissions. As for the final Blue Flame 6 models, even though GM sales literature hints that a 3-speed manual was available (the combination was used to establish the printed catalog base price), closer examination of the fine print shows the $178.35 Powerglide automatic to have been a “mandatory option.” The few manual-equipped V-8s were constructed in the second half of the model year.

      75 In later years, Corvette assembly workers were faced with a multitude of possible rear-axle ratios to install. But things were simple from 1953 to 1955, when open-type carriers and 3.55:1 gear sets were the rule. The first deviation came in 1955 when a 3.27:1 ratio arrived for late-year V-8 cars with the 3-speed manual transmission.

      76 Corvette was the first Chevrolet passenger car to deviate from the division’s traditional torque-tube driveline, which was used from the start. Lead chassis designer Maurice Olley (a former Rolls-Royce employee) knew that passing a tube through the frame’s central X-member would force unacceptable drive-tunnel enlargement and infringe on space available for the bucket seats, a sports-car must. Corvette’s open driveshaft also simplified the art of driveline modification, quickly endearing it to hot rodders who began swapping engines, transmissions, and axles almost immediately.

      77 Another strike against the torque tube was the Corvette’s slight 102-inch wheelbase and severe engine setback. Less than 3 feet stood between the tail of the transmission and differential pinion. Attempting to stuff a rigid drive tube in the space was not workable on a car with sporting intent, where severe cornering loads triggered major shifts in the body-to-axle distance.

      78 The open driveshaft let the chassis designers take full advantage of the hypoid gear set’s positioning of the pinion gear on a lower axis than the center line of the ring gear. This lowered the driveshaft trajectory and allowed reduction of the driveshaft tunnel size for more interior room.

      79 Unlike previous Chevrolet practice that put the rear leaf springs inboard of, or directly below, the frame rails, Corvette springs were set outboard of the frame on outriggers. This allowed for much lower body placement and lowered the center of gravity for improved handling.

      80 The Corvette and its larger pre-1955 passenger-car siblings shared the same rear axle type but with alterations to the differential case to seal off the pinion bearing and accommodate an externally positioned universal joint and drive yoke. The “banjo” housing and bolt-on inspection cover were essentially unchanged except for variations to track width and spring mounts.

      81 For 1955, Chevy’s all-new passenger cars broke free from the torque-tube era. To handle the growing horsepower and torque of the V-8 age, a new rear axle housing with an integral (welded on) rear cover replaced the previous double-open housing of 1954. Interestingly, the new 1955 axle housing was not used on Corvettes until 1956. They retained the 10-bolt rear inspection cover for this final year.

      82 Ask any chassis designer and he’ll tell you: after jounce (downward force) comes rebound (upward bounce back). When proving-grounds tests revealed excessive rear-axle drop on Corvettes launched over steep moguls at speed, fabric rebound straps were added to limit damage to shock absorbers and universal joints. These straps ran from the ends of the axle tube to frame-mounted anchor points.

      83 Unlike most leaf-sprung American passenger cars with the rear shackles set under compression, the Corvette’s rear shackles were anchored to the frame below the leaf-spring eye. This put them in tension (as if being pulled apart rather than squashed). It was part of Olley’s recipe to set the leaf springs so their leading bushings/mounts were lower than their rearward counterparts (when viewed from the side). This manipulated the thrust angle of the axle and gave the Corvette a tendency toward predictable oversteer, which remained through the 1962 model run.

      84 By arranging the rear leaf springs as far outboard as possible and positioning the transmission high, Chevrolet was able to route the Corvette’s driveshaft high enough to avoid conflicts with the frame’s vitally important central X-member. Deviations in the design would have necessitated СКАЧАТЬ