Название: Judgment Aggregation
Автор: Gabriella Pigozzi
Издательство: Ingram
Жанр: Компьютерное Железо
Серия: Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
isbn: 9781681731780
isbn:
Lecture #27
Series Editors: Ronald J. Brachman, Yahoo! Labs
William W. Cohen, Carnegie Mellon University
Peter Stone, University of Texas at Austin
Series ISSN
Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
Print 1939-4608 Electronic 1939-4616
Judgment Aggregation: A Primer
Davide Grossi
University of Liverpool
Gabriella Pigozzi
Université Paris Dauphine
SYNTHESIS LECTURES ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND MACHINE LEARNING #27
ABSTRACT
Judgment aggregation is a mathematical theory of collective decision-making. It concerns the methods whereby individual opinions about logically interconnected issues of interest can, or cannot, be aggregated into one collective stance. Aggregation problems have traditionally been of interest for disciplines like economics and the political sciences, as well as philosophy, where judgment aggregation itself originates from, but have recently captured the attention of disciplines like computer science, artificial intelligence and multi-agent systems. Judgment aggregation has emerged in the last decade as a unifying paradigm for the formalization and understanding of aggregation problems. Still, no comprehensive presentation of the theory is available to date. This Synthesis Lecture aims at filling this gap presenting the key motivations, results, abstractions and techniques underpinning it.
KEYWORDS
judgment aggregation, collective decision-making, logic, social choice theory, computational social choice, preference aggregation, voting paradoxes, aggregation rules, impossibility results, manipulability, ultrafilters, opinion pooling, deliberation
DG—to my grandmother Alice, in memoriam
GP—to my mother and to the memory of my father
Contents
1 Logic Meets Social Choice Theory
1.1 A Concise History of Social Choice Theory
1.1.2 Modern Social Choice Theory
1.2.1 From the Doctrinal Paradox to the Discursive Dilemma
1.2.2 Preference Aggregation and Judgment Aggregation
2.1.1 Agendas in Propositional Logic
2.1.2 Judgment Sets and Profiles
2.1.4 Examples: Aggregation Rules
2.2.1 How Interconnected is an Agenda?
2.2.2 Comparing Agenda Conditions
2.3 Aggregation Conditions
2.3.1 How Should an Aggregation Function Behave?
2.3.2 On the ‘Meaning’ of the Aggregation Conditions
2.4 Further Topics
2.4.1 Abstract Aggregation
2.4.2 General Logics
3.1 What is the Majority Rule Like?
3.1.1 Properties of Propositionwise Majority
3.1.2 Characterizing Propositionwise Majority
3.2 An Impossibility Theorem
3.2.1 Winning Coalitions
3.2.2 Winning Coalitions as Ultrafilters
3.2.3 Dictators
3.2.4 The Theorem
3.3 (Ultra)filters, Dictators and Oligarchs
3.3.1 Impossibility of Non-Oligarchic Aggregation
3.3.2 Proof: from Ultrafilters to Filters
3.3.3 Impossibility via (Ultra)filters
3.4 Further Topics
3.4.1 Other Impossibility Results