Open Secrets. Rabbi Rami M. Shapiro

Чтение книги онлайн.

      JUDAISM

      My dearest Aaron Hershel,

      You are quite right that we need to begin at the beginning. A new land, a new start. But as to your suggestion of “a new Judaism,” who is to say? That is not my intent. My intent is just to answer your questions.

      So, the question is “What is Judaism?” You know, of course, the Talmud’s section on defining Judaism (Makkot 23b): Rabbi Simlai began by saying that the 613 mitzvot (commandments) were reduced to 11 by King David (Psalm 15), to six by Isaiah (Isaiah: 33:15), and then to three by Micah (Micah: 6:8). Isaiah further reduced them to two: “Keep judgment and righteousness.” Amos came and reduced them to one: “Seek Me and live” (Amos: 5:4). Habbakuk proposed an alternative: “The Righteous live by faith” (Habbakuk: 2:4).

      And I am certain you remember Hillel’s famous reply to the Gentile who demanded he teach all of Torah while standing on one foot: “Do not do to others what you would not want done to yourself. That is the whole of Torah. The rest is commentary. Now go and study it” (Shabbat 31a).

      I am partial to these one foot Judaisms. They are simple, direct, and profound. And they leave us free to shape a Jewish life around principle rather than tradition. I am not opposed to tradition, God forbid, but I do not think it superior to principle. On the contrary, tradition is our record of the way our ancestors lived these principles in the past. We should see them as catalysts to our own creativity and not as fixed forms to be imitated. This already is treif (not kosher, heretical) thinking on my part and I do not share this with my peers, but the teacher should not pretend before the student.

      So here is my one foot Judaism: Judaism is the Jewish people’s ancient and, God willing, ongoing effort to make tikkun and teshuvah. The rest is commentary. Now go and study it.

      What do you think? On a par with Amos and Hillel? Probably not. Yerachmiel is no Habbakuk. But it is what I believe. Judaism is simply tikkun and teshuvah. Of course now I must be clear as to what I mean by tikkun and teshuvah.

      Tikkun means “repair.” The great saint and kabbalist Isaac Luria, peace be upon him (1534–1572), was the first to use this term in a spiritual way. He believed that when God set out to create the world, God, being infinite, had to contract in order to make room for what would become the finite world. God intended to pour the divine energy into specially constructed vessels that would form the foundation of creation. Yet God erred, so to speak, in the construction of these vessels and when the divine light entered them they shattered, spilling God, as it were, all over the cosmos.

      These shattered fragments of God became trapped in klippot (shells) and these became embedded in the world you and I inhabit. Reb Luria taught that it was the task of the Jew to free these trapped sparks of God and return them to God by treating all things with utmost reverence and respect. Since the sparks were scattered across the world, the Jews would have to be scattered across the world. Our loss of Israel and our holy Temple in Jerusalem was not a punishment for our disobedience to God, but essential to God’s plan. Who among us would have left the Holy Land of our own free will? No one! So God had the Romans push us out. What appeared to us as a loss of holiness, turns out in Luria’s mind to be the way to holiness.

      As you know, his understanding spoke to so many of our people. Luria’s teaching replaced the horror of exile with the hope for redemption. And hope is the sap of life; without hope there is only lifeless form.

      But, I will tell you, Aaron Hershel, that I do not believe Reb Luria meant us to take this teaching literally. Or, if he did, I for one cannot do so. What Luria saw as a process happening in God and the world, I see as a process happening only in our minds.

      Did God really shrink to make room for creation? No! God is infinite. Can the infinite become finite? Of course not; the infinite includes the finite. What happens is not that God shrinks, but that the Neshamah, the ego, imagines a distant God to allow for the illusion of a separate self. And, once it has established itself as separate it goes about exploiting others in order to maintain its selfish delusion.

      This, the Neshamah’s rejection of the fundamental unity of all life in, with, and as God is to me the real understanding of the breaking of the vessels. The ego was meant to be a way of knowing God in the relative and finite world of seemingly separate things. But it came to identify so closely with this world that it could no longer place itself in the larger context of the unity of all things in God. Do not think I am saying ego is bad or that we should eliminate it. Ego is vital to our daily functioning in the world. We need a self to interact with the world. But we must not imagine that this self is anything more than a vessel of something far greater than it.

      You and I and all living things are the vessels of God, the embodiment of Elohut (Godhead). In this we are one with God, yet we imagine ourselves to be separate from God and this creates in us the idea of brokenness. The brokenness of the world starts as a process in the mind, but it doesn’t end there. We go about the world breaking it up into smaller and smaller segments, each often at war with the rest, without ever realizing we are warring with ourselves.

      Tikkun is the process of putting things СКАЧАТЬ