American Democracy in Context. Joseph A. Pika

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ and New Zealand, are now the exception. Yet the success of our Constitution depends not only on the strength and flexibility of its own structure but also on the convergence of other less-definable factors, including timing and luck, coupled with an underlying commitment to the rule of law. This makes it more difficult to determine how, when, or even whether the success of the U.S. Constitution can be duplicated in other countries.

      We tend to take the success of our system of government for granted and forget that its structure was not preordained. As we have seen, the framers of the Constitution had fundamentally different views on many issues. Many aspects of our government could have been different if competing arguments had won at the Constitutional Convention, state ratifying conventions, or any number of other points in our history.

      For example, think of how things might have been different if the United States had not approved a written Constitution and embraced judicial review as a mechanism to enforce it. We could have survived—and probably survived quite well—without either of them (the United Kingdom has), but the consequences to you and our democratic system would have been quite profound. We will see in future chapters how much judicial review touches all of our lives. School desegregation, abortion rights, and free speech protections—to name just a few things shaped by judicial review—would have had to come from political action rather than the courts. That means that some of the rights you now expect might have been delayed or never even granted. But it also means that politicians would have had to confront some issues on which they now defer to courts. The result would have been a system worse in some ways and perhaps better in others, but the result would have had a direct impact on your life.

      As a final cautionary note, it is worth remembering that at the end of the day, the words of the Constitution are not enough to guarantee either liberty or the rule of law. Those words must be enforced. Many governments—including dictatorial regimes—have had constitutions with lofty but often meaningless language protecting basic rights. Even in our own country, African Americans were denied fundamental rights, such as the ability to vote, long after the Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution had abolished slavery, the Fourteenth Amendment guaranteed the equal protection of the laws, and the Fifteenth Amendment proclaimed that the right to vote would not be abridged because of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. As the great twentieth-century American judge Learned Hand once wrote: “Liberty lies in the hearts of men and women; when it dies there, no constitution, no law, no court can save it; no constitution, no law, no court can even do much to help it.”⁵⁷

      Critical Thinking Questions

      1 Constitution making often takes place in crisis-laden, post-conflict situations that provide disincentives to cooperation and make the creation of a successful constitution difficult. Remember that the first attempt to create a constitution for the United States—the Articles of Confederation—failed. What factors account for the successful drafting and ratification of the subsequent U.S. Constitution?

      2 Imagine if round-the-clock cable news networks, attack ads, and the Internet had existed when our Constitution was written and ratified. How might they have changed the process? Would it have been harder for James Madison to prevail over Patrick Henry in today’s media environment? Why or why not?

      3 Identify ways in which the original Constitution was undemocratic. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of those provisions. How have amendments made the Constitution more democratic? What undemocratic features remain? Should any of these remaining features be altered or abolished? If so, which ones, and how?

      4 Think about the four core principles of the Constitution discussed in this chapter: republicanism, federalism, separation of powers, and checks and balances. Each influences the way government operates and the policies it enacts. Now think about a policy issue that is important to you—for example, education, health care reform, or the legalization of marijuana—and assess how each of these principles affects the development and implementation of that policy.

      Key Terms

       Anti-Federalists 43

       Articles of Confederation 31

       checks and balances 40

       confederation 31

       coordinate construction 48

       Declaration of Independence 30

       enumerated powers 41

       Federalist Papers 44

       Federalists 43

       Great Compromise 37

       implied powers 42

       New Jersey Plan 36

       republicanism 39

       separation of powers 40

       Shays’ Rebellion 33

       social contract 30

       Stamp Act Congress 27

       supremacy clause 40

       Three-Fifths Compromise 36

       Virginia Plan 35

      Descriptions of Images and Figures

      Back to image

      The details in the card are as follows.

      Kansas City, Missouri Police Department

      Adult Miranda Warning

      1. You have the right to remain silent.

      2. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law.

      3. You have the right to talk to a lawyer and have him present with you while you are being questioned.

      4. If you cannot afford to hire a lawyer, one will be appointed to represent you before any questioning, if you wish.

      5. You can decide at any time to exercise these rights and not answer any questions or make any statements.

      Adult Waiver

      After the warning and in order to secure a waiver the following questions should be asked and an affirmative reply secured to each question.

      1. Do you understand each of these rights I have explained to you?

      2. Having these rights in mind, do you wish to talk to us now?

      Back to image

      Revere’s engraving of the Boston Massacre shows a row of armed men firing on the right and a few men lying dead on the street to the left. Another man who is wounded is being carried away by others. A few women are also shown standing behind them, one of whom is wringing her hands. A man is shown standing with his hand in his pocket looking to the side. A dog is standing in front looking at the soldiers firing. Most of the civilians are dressed in breeches, coat, waistcoat, and a hat.

      Back to image

      The details are as follows.

      Three СКАЧАТЬ