Название: Driving Eureka!
Автор: Doug Hall
Издательство: Ingram
Жанр: Управление, подбор персонала
isbn: 9781578605828
isbn:
David Carr wrote in The New York Times, “Change comes very slowly, but then happens all at once. The future, as it always does, sets its own schedule.”
HINT: If Your Goal Is to Make Money, Innovation Is the Only Choice
Recently, a CEO I know told me: “We’re conservative. We’re slow to change.” Or as another CEO told me: “Doug, I don’t get it. I don’t know how to innovate, my team doesn’t know how to innovate, and, frankly, my customers have never asked us to innovate. Why the focus on innovation?”
If a purpose of your company is to make money, or if a desire of your nonprofit is to survive and sustain, then innovation is your only choice.
Researchers at Georgia Tech have compared companies’ self-reported strategies for success versus the profit margin they realize. As the chart that follows shows, the conclusion is simple—if you want to make more money, innovation is the only strategy. Companies pursuing innovation as their core business strategy realize 50 to 100% higher profit margins than those that pursue “low cost, high quality, fast delivery, or voice of the customer (doing whatever the customer says).”
Basic economic theory predicts these research results. When you offer something that is meaningful and that no one else offers, you have a monopoly, resulting in higher profitability.
It’s the Best Time to Be in Business!
The interconnected marketplace is creating exciting opportunities for increasing innovation speed. Just as it’s empowering customers, it’s empowering companies. Proactive leaders can discover and develop breakthrough technologies with faster speed and less risk if they upgrade their management and innovation systems to leverage the opportunities present in the new marketplace.
Evidence of the rising ability to innovate is the number of patent filings in the USA. The USA is a great barometer, as the market is big and many of the world’s patent offices use the US filings as benchmarks.
Historically, patent filings have grown at a slow and stable rate. However, as the chart that follows shows, as the number of internet users around the world has grown, so, too, has the number of patent filings. The internet has enabled inventors and entrepreneurs to make technical connections, conduct patent searches, and find opportunities faster than ever before. It has made it the best of times to be an inventor.
Interestingly, two out of three patents filed in the USA are granted to someone either born outside the USA or to a company from outside the USA. To borrow a line from Bruce Springsteen, “Born in the USA, owned in the USA” is not the way with technology anymore. The internet is making it easy for everyone everywhere to innovate. In fact, somewhere in South Korea, Northern Ireland, or South Africa, there is someone with an idea, some education, and a ton of motivation to disrupt your company, industry, and career.
The Classic Management System Can’t Keep Up with the New Rate of Change
When the pace of change was slower, it was possible to treat strategy, innovation, and the way we work together as independent functions, just as Henry Ford segmented work on the production line. However, as the world moves faster, we don’t have the time for the inevitable meetings, communications, miscommunications, and rework that are created by the classic command-and-control management system.
The challenge today’s leaders face is that, as the life cycle has accelerated, their method of management has not adapted to the new pace of change. The classic method of managing innovation as a department, or as something led by specialists, is just not fast enough anymore.
What’s needed is a culture in which innovation is the mission of everyone, everywhere, every day—a culture in which innovation is enabled through scalable education systems and tools. The result is an amplification of the effectiveness of employees just as a tractor amplifies the amount of land a farmer can work versus with a horse and plow.
To restart success for organizations that are the victims of change: Cost cutting won’t solve the problem. Working harder won’t solve the problem. Beating the workers won’t solve the problem.
The ONLY sustainable solution to the accelerated pace of change is to create a culture of innovation.
The Five False Innovation Cures
Growing an innovation culture is hard. It’s really hard. The existing infrastructure has evolved over time to be 100% focused on decreasing risk. And, as the marketplace changes faster, the culture responds by amplifying its avoidance of risk.
Worse yet, we are organized in companies the same way we were in universities—in departmental silos. Each worker reports to a head of a silo—be it manufacturing, marketing, product development, finance, legal, market research, or sales. The corporate system rewards loyalty to the silo more than to the organization. It is the silo that gives us a pay raise. It is the silo that prevents us from being laid off or downsized.
It is very easy for every silo to do a perfect job, but collectively we are not effective. Dr. Deming spoke about how everyone applying their best efforts, working with diligence, can still result in the company going out of business. The reason is that the success of an organization lies in the interactions between the people, processes, and departments.
Getting the system to work is so difficult that most leaders are not willing to take on the challenge. As the CEO of a Fortune 50 company told me: “I don’t have the energy to change the system. When it comes to innovation, our system is broken—that’s why I set up these special teams working outside the system.”
When leaders are ready to confront the reality that: 1) they need to innovate to compete in today’s marketplace and 2) their current system for innovation management doesn’t work, they frequently seek out one or more of what the Innovation Engineering Pioneers call “False Cures.” These are simplistic management fixes that sound promising but, in the long term, often cause more damage than good.
FALSE CURE 1: MORE INSPECTION, METRICS, AND BIGGER REWARD. The hypothesis is: If management reviews the development of innovations more frequently and diligently, then innovation success will be realized. The truth is that inspection of quality doesn’t work. Just as in the factory, innovation quality must be built into the organization’s work systems and tools.
A related hypothesis is that if we manage by metrics and reward people for hitting the numbers, then innovation success will be realized. The truth is that metrics without a method simply creates stress that ignites the “gaming” of the system to hit the numbers.
Metrics are invaluable when used as a tool for improving the system. They are destructive when used as a means for motivating. Metrics are the outcome of the system. Sustained improvement in metrics only occurs with improvement in the methods and tools that make up the work system.
Success with innovation requires intrinsic passion and dedication. The promise of extrinsic rewards will not sustain innovators through the inevitable ups and downs that occur when trying to discover and develop a Meaningfully Unique innovation. As Dr. Deming and others have taught, extrinsic СКАЧАТЬ