Automotive Safety Integrity Level A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ Score

      101. Has the Automotive Safety Integrity Level work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      102. Does system satisfy technical system safety requirements?

      <--- Score

      103. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      104. Is there a clear Automotive Safety Integrity Level case definition?

      <--- Score

      105. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Automotive Safety Integrity Level results are met?

      <--- Score

      106. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      107. Is there a Automotive Safety Integrity Level management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      108. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      109. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      110. How does the Automotive Safety Integrity Level manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      111. What sources do you use to gather information for a Automotive Safety Integrity Level study?

      <--- Score

      112. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      113. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Automotive Safety Integrity Level? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      114. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      115. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      116. Can the software tool malfunction that it introduces or fails to detect errors of safety requirements?

      <--- Score

      117. What are the Automotive Safety Integrity Level use cases?

      <--- Score

      118. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      119. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      120. How will the Automotive Safety Integrity Level team and the group measure complete success of Automotive Safety Integrity Level?

      <--- Score

      121. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      122. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      123. What are the record-keeping requirements of Automotive Safety Integrity Level activities?

      <--- Score

      124. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      125. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      126. Are the Automotive Safety Integrity Level requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      127. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      128. Is Automotive Safety Integrity Level required?

      <--- Score

      129. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      130. Is there a critical path to deliver Automotive Safety Integrity Level results?

      <--- Score

      131. Is there any additional Automotive Safety Integrity Level definition of success?

      <--- Score

      132. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      133. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      134. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      135. How can the value of Automotive Safety Integrity Level be defined?

      <--- Score

      Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

      Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

      Transfer your score to the Automotive Safety Integrity Level Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

      CRITERION #3: MEASURE:

      INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.

      In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

      5 Strongly Agree

      4 Agree

      3 Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

      1. Where can you go to verify the info?

      <--- Score

      2. How is performance СКАЧАТЬ