Public Health Information System A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      57. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      58. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      59. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      60. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      61. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      62. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      63. Who are the Public health information system improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      64. Why are you doing Public health information system and what is the scope?

      <--- Score

      65. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      66. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      67. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      68. Is there any additional Public health information system definition of success?

      <--- Score

      69. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Public health information system changes?

      <--- Score

      70. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      71. What Public health information system services do you require?

      <--- Score

      72. How does the Public health information system manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      73. Have all basic functions of Public health information system been defined?

      <--- Score

      74. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      75. Has the Public health information system work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      76. How have you defined all Public health information system requirements first?

      <--- Score

      77. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      78. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      79. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      80. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Public health information system?

      <--- Score

      81. Is there a critical path to deliver Public health information system results?

      <--- Score

      82. Who is gathering Public health information system information?

      <--- Score

      83. How would you define Public health information system leadership?

      <--- Score

      84. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      85. How do you gather Public health information system requirements?

      <--- Score

      86. What happens if Public health information system’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      87. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      88. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      89. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      90. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      91. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      92. How do you manage changes in Public health information system requirements?

      <--- Score

      93. How do you think the partners involved in Public health information system would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      94. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      95. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      96. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      97. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

СКАЧАТЬ