Общественные палаты в субъектах РФ: между медиацией и имитацией. Коллектив авторов
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Общественные палаты в субъектах РФ: между медиацией и имитацией - Коллектив авторов страница 10

СКАЧАТЬ style="font-size:15px;">      Роудс, с. 70.

      8

      Heclo H. Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance. NewHaven: YaleUniversityPress. 1974. P. 305.

      9

      Hall, Peter A. 'Policy paradigms, social learning and the state, 'a paper presented to the International Political Science Association, Washington, D.C. 1988.

      10

      Lindblom, Charles E. and D. K. Cohen. Usable Knowledge: Social Science and Social Problem Solving. New Haven: Yale University Press. 1979.

      11

      Rose, Richard 'What is lesson-drawing. 'Journal of Public Policy, 1991. 11:3-30

      12

      Sabatier P. 1978. The Acquisition and Utilization of Technical Information by Administrative Agencies. – Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol. 23.N 3. P. 396– 417.

      13

      Сабатье П., Дженкинс-Смит Х. Концепция лобби-коалиций: оценка. – Публичная политика: от теории к практике. СПб.: Алетейя. 2008. C. 94–154.

      14

      SabatierP. The advocacy coalition frame work: revision sandrelevance for Europe – Journal of European Public Policy. 1998.Vol. 5. N 1.P. 98–130.

      15

      Сунгуров А.Ю. Как возникают политические инновации: «фабрики мысли» и другие институты-медиаторы. М.: Политическаяэнциклопедия. 2015

      16

      Guston D.H. 1999. Stabilizing the boundary between U.S. politics and science: The role of the Ofifce of Technology Transfer as a boundary organization. – Social Studies of Science. Vol. 29.N 1. P. 87–112; Guston D.H. 2000. Between politics and science: Assuring the integrity and productivity of research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

      17

      Cash D.W. In Order to Aid in Diffusing Useful and Practical Information»: Agricultural Extension and Boundary Organizations. – Science, Technology and Human. 2001. Vol. 26. N 4.P. 450

      18

      Medvetz Th. Murky Power: “Think Tanks” as Boundary Organizations. – Rethinking Power in Organizations, Institutions, and Markets Research in the Sociology of Organizations. 2012. Vol. 34. P. 113–133.

      19

      Hoppe R. 2009. Scientific advice and public policy: expert advisers’ and policymakers’ discourses on boundary work. – Poiesis& Praxis. Vol. 6. N 3–4. P. 235–263; Hoppe R, Wesselink A., Cairns R. 2013.Lost in the problem: the role of boundary organisations in the governance of climate change. – Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. Vol. 4. N 4. P. 283–300.

      20

      The Politics of Scientific Advice: Institutional Design for Quality Assurance. / Ed. by Justus Lentsch and Peter Weingart. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.

      21

      Michael Schudson. The Trouble with Experts – and Why Democracies Need Them // Theory and Society, Vol. 35, No. 5/6 (Dec., 2006), pp. 491-506; Mark B. Brown. The Politics of Representation on Government Advisory Committees // Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 61, No. 4 (Dec., 2008), pp. 547-560; RogerPielke Jr. & Roberta Klein. The Rise and Fall of the Science Advisor to the President of the United States. // Minerva (2009) 47:7–29.

      22

      Mai'a K. Davis Cross. Rethinking epistemic communities twenty years later. // Review of International Studies , Vol.39. N. 01, January 2013, pp 137-160.

      23

      Clark A. Miller. Civic Epistemologies: Constituting Knowledge and Order in Political Communities // Sociology Compass 2/6 (2008): 1896–1919.

      24

      Guston 1999.

      25

      Сунгуров А.Ю. Организации-посредники в структуре гражданского общества. Некоторые проблемы политической модернизации России. – Полис. Политические исследования. 1999. № 6. С. 34–48.

      26

      Карл Т.Л., Шмиттер Ф. Демократизация: концепты, постулаты, гипотезы. Размышления по поводу применимости транзитологической парадигмы при изучении посткоммунистических трансформаций. // Полис, 2004, 4, с. 6-27; Мельвиль А.Ю. Опыт теоретико-методологического синтеза структурного и процедурного подходов к демократическим транзитам // Полис, 1998, 2, с. 6–38; Linz, Juan J. &Stepan, Alfred. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. – Baltimore and London: The John Hopkins University Press, 1996; Ronald A. Francisco. The politics of regime transitions – Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 2000.

      27

      Шмиттер Ф. Размышления о гражданском обществе и консолидации демократии. //Полис, 1996, № 5.С.16-27; The Consolidation of Democracy in East-Central Europe. Edited by Karen Dawisha and Bruce Parrott. – Cambridge: Cambridge University press, 1997; Diamond, Larry. Toward Democratic Consolidation. – In: Diamond, Larry and Plattner, Marc.F., Eds. The Global Resurgence of Democracy. Second Edition. – Baltimore, and London: The John Hopkins University Press, 1996, p.227-240.

      28

      Публичное СКАЧАТЬ