Теоретическая грамматика английского языка (Theoretical Grammar of the English language). М. Науменко
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу Теоретическая грамматика английского языка (Theoretical Grammar of the English language) - М. Науменко страница 7
Название: Теоретическая грамматика английского языка (Theoretical Grammar of the English language)
Автор: М. Науменко
Издательство: Южный Федеральный Университет
Жанр: Учебная литература
isbn: 9785927526116
isbn:
4. There is another viewpoint of the problem of case differentiation in English, held by Russian linguists Prof.Vorontsova, Prof. Ilyish, Prof. Barkhudarov, Prof. Shteling and some others. It states that the English noun has completely lost its category of case in the course of its historical development. The relations thought as the ones rendered by the Genitive case are represented by a noun with a postposition which is similar to the noun with a preposition. This view is called “the theory of the possessive postposition”. To support this theory Prof. Vo-rontsova gives the example of possessive postposition “’s” attached not only to a single word, but to a phrase “ somebody else’s daughter”.
In Prof. Blokh’s opinion the phrasal use of the postpositional -’s has a stylistic colouring. Moreover, statistical data show that the –‘s is attached to individual nouns in 96% of its total use. Secondly, the –‘s has an obvious morphemic property; it is strictly postpositional, unlike the prepositions, and it’s not registered in dictionaries as a separate word.
To sum up, we share the viewpoint that there exists a two case declension of nouns in English. The sign- ‘s has a clear particle nature, it can be added both to individual nouns and nounal groups. Thus two types of Genitive can be differentiated: the word Genitive, and the phrase Genitive.
The category of article determination
The main formal element of the noun category of determination is the article (Blokh, 2000). The article is a determining unit of specific nature accompanying the noun. There are some other determiners in English, such as pronouns: this, any, some, which explicitly interpret the referent of the noun in relation to other objects or phenomena. The article just specifies the referent, defines it in the most general way. The use of the article is obligatory with nouns. There exist two basic approaches to the problem of the article status.
1. The article is a self-sufficient word which forms with the modified noun a syntactic syntagma;
2. The article is the morpheme-like element which builds up with the noun stem a specific morpheme.
The majority of linguists view the article as a unit of language intermediary between the word and the morpheme. The article can be viewed in terms of the oppositional theory. On the higher level the definite article is opposed to the indefinite article and the meaningful absence of article, the definite article being the strong member means identification. On the lower level the weak member of the upper opposition is regarded as an opposition of two types of generalization.
Thus, the system of articles in English is described as one consisting of three articles: the definite article expresses the categorial meaning of identification: the indefinite expresses relative generalization and the zero article expresses absolute generalization.
Adjective as a Part of Speech
The adjective expresses the categorial semantics of property of а substance. It means that each adjective used in the text denotes some characteristics of the noun referent (material, colour, etc.). According to Prof. Blokh, it follows from this that adjectives do not have a full nominative value like nouns (Blokh, 2000).
Adjectives are distinguished by a specific combinability with nouns, which they modify, usually in pre-position, and occasionally in post-position; by a combinability with link-verbs, by a combinability with modifying adverbs. In the sentence the adjective performs the functions of an attribute and a predicative. Of the two, the more specific function of the adjective is that of an attribute, since the function of a predicative can be performed by other parts of speech (noun, pronoun, numeral).
Substantivization of the adjective. Also adjectives can perform the syntactic functions characteristic of the noun: subject or object. Adjectives in these cases are used with the definite article and usually mean a lot of people: The rich and the poor will never understand each other.
To the derivational features of adjectives belong a number of suffixes and prefixes of which the most important are: -ful, -less, -ish, -ous, -ive, -ic; un-, in-, pre-. Among the adjectival affixes should also be named the prefix a-, constitutive for the stative subclass.
English adjectives have the category of comparison. Semantically all the adjectives fall into two subclasses: qualititative adjectives (showing the quality of the substance (big, good, beautiful, etc.) which can form the degrees of comparison, and relative adjectives (expressing a characteristic through a relation to an object: wooden, industrial, etc.) which do not form the degrees of comparison. However, in actual speech the described principle of distinction is not at all strictly observed. On the one hand, some qualitative adjectives can denote such qualities of substances which are incompatible with the idea of degrees of comparison. Here refer adjectives like extinct, immobile, deaf, final, fixed, etc. On the other hand, many relative adjectives form degrees of comparison, transforming the denoted relative property of a substance into such as can be graded quantitatively, e.g.: of a military design – of а less military design – of а тоrе military design (Blokh, 2000).
In order to overcome the demonstrated lack of rigour in the differentiation of qualitative and relative adjectives, Prof. M.Y. Blokh introduced an additional linguistic distinction which is more adaptable to the chances of usage. The suggested distinction is based on the evaluative function of adjectives. Thus, all the adjectives can be used either evaluatively or specificatively, depending on the context. Prof. Blokh states that it emphasizes the fact that the morphological category of comparison (comparison degrees) is potentially represented in the whole class of adjectives, and not only in the class of qualitative adjectives.
Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.
Текст предоставлен ООО «ЛитРес».
Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на ЛитРес.
Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.