What Doctors Don’t Tell You. Lynne McTaggart

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ false-positives in HIV tests. Other populations exposed to a greater than normal amount of disease – such as Africans and drug-users – also make many more antibodies than the rest of us and therefore are likely to end up with a false reading.

      Blood transfusions can also produce a false-positive HIV test result. In one study, the amount of HIV antibody detected in ELISA tests was greatest immediately after blood transfusion, and thereafter decreased.¹²⁴ One volunteer was given six injections of donated HIV-negative blood at four-day intervals. After the first injection his HIV test was negative, but the HIV-positive antibody response increased with each subsequent transfusion.¹²⁵

      Of course, the greatest problem with an HIV test is that a positive test labels you HIV positive for life. Being HIV positive can bar you from insurance, employment, marriage or even entry into another country. The HIV test can also launch many healthy patients on the inexorable road to ‘just-in-case’ AIDS treatment with drugs whose considerable, even life-threatening side-effects bear uncanny resemblance to the list of symptoms doctors describe in HIV infection or full-blown AIDS.

      ‘OSCOPY’ TESTS

      Most other tests you’re likely to encounter are more invasive, requiring that your doctor inject or penetrate your body with something. These can include ‘oscopy’ tests, where an optic tube or ‘scope’ is passed through a bodily orifice in order to inspect the inside of the appropriate body cavity – the stomach (endoscopy), abdomen and pelvis (laparoscopy), lungs (bronchoscopy), colon (colonoscopy), cervix (colposcopy), rectum and lower colon (flexible sigmoidoscopy, or even the knee joint (arthroscopy).

      Although doctors consider the common endoscopy routine, there are enormous risks, including perforation of the wall of the oesophagus, stomach or duodenum (the small intestine), infections and adverse reactions to anaesthetic – even death. Up to one in 36 patients ends up with a perforation, and nearly one in 100 patients will suffer one so serious that it proves fatal.¹²⁶ Overall, it’s estimated that endoscopy is killing one in 2,000 patients. This poor batting average only came to light because a special audit of UK hospitals was carried out to look into the long-term effects of the technique.¹²⁷ The study discovered that patients were dying up to 30 days after having the test, usually from heart or respiratory complications. Complications are occurring because the test requires the patient to be sedated, which means the patient can still respond but cannot feel any pain. Nevertheless, sedated patients must be carefully monitored; inadequate monitoring is the cause of 20 per cent of all deaths related to anaesthesia.

      Another recurrent problem with ‘oscopy’ tests, such as endoscopes and bronchoscopes, are outbreaks of infection occurring in American hospitals caused by inadequately sterilized flexible fibre-optic endoscopes and bronchoscopes. According to the US Food and Drug Administration, up to one-quarter of all endoscopes, even those that are sterilized, contain 100,000 or more different types of bacteria, a fertile ground for cross-contamination. Although there are no known cases of HIV infection due to endoscopy, there is evidence of the transmission of hepatitis B and C, and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.¹²⁸

      The devices are cleaned and disinfected either manually, which is time-consuming for a busy hospital, or, increasingly, by automated machines. After investigating an outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, causing infection of the gall bladder, which occurred in one American hospital, the American Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found the culprit to be a thick film of P.aeruginosa which had formed in the detergent-holding tank, water hose and air vents of the automated disinfecting machine. Attempts to disinfect the machine according to the manufacturer’s instructions using commercial preparations of glutaraldehyde were unsuccessful.

      After the second outbreak, the American Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requested that one of the manufacturers send out a safety alert to all hospitals with its products, recommending that a stringent rinsing programme be adopted for the cleaning of the machines. The FDA has also suspended the further sale of any of the machines until the contamination problem is resolved. In the meantime, even disinfectant has caused side-effects such as bloody diarrhoea among patients and hospital staff alike.¹²⁹

      As for laparoscopy, three out of every 1,000 of these procedures cause complications, and even death. Between 1995 and 1997, more than 500 patients suffered nearly 600 injuries, and 65 died.¹³⁰ A goodly number have to do with doctors being unable to use the equipment properly. In a survey of gynaecologists, one in every 25 had injured a major vessel during laparoscopy at some point in their career.¹³¹

      One of the main culprits is the common use of the trocar (a sharp implement which withdraws fluids by puncturing the abdominal wall), which frequently injures major blood vessels and major organs, sometimes causing death due to vascular injuries.¹³²

      Arthroscopy, another ‘oscopy’ used to examine the knee, can cause deep vein thrombosis. Nearly a fifth of patients undergoing the procedure develop the condition.¹³³

      BIOPSIES

      When the mere image of a body part won’t yield up the problem, doctors resort to nicking off a piece of you and studying it under the microscope. These types of tests include those in which one or more of the body’s tissues or fluids are withdrawn for examination, such as biopsies, bone marrow aspiration or spinal tap (also called lumbar puncture). There are four types of biopsies, ranging from removal of a few cells to excising a good-sized chunk with a scalpel or through the use of an endoscope with a tiny set of forceps, for those body parts conventional methods can’t reach. Even such a seemingly simple test as a tissue sample is not without risk. About a fifth of lumbar punctures lead to injury. Although it had always been assumed that injuries occurred when a junior doctor carried out the procedure, new evidence now finds that mistakes occur across the board, even with very experienced practitioners.¹³⁴

      Spinal taps have also been used to diagnose children with bacterial meningitis, the disease’s most dangerous form. But research now shows that, with spinal taps, children are 30 times more likely to develop herniation, a catastrophic complication of bacterial meningitis, with a high risk of death or damage.¹³⁵

      As for biopsy, when a sample tissue is being removed to help diagnose suspected cancer, certain types have a terrible batting average. For instance, biopsy of the prostate, one of the most common, is wrong in one of four cases, even when multiple tissue sites are taken.¹³⁶ Breast, liver, kidney, lung, pancreas and lymph node (sentinel node) biopsy results all have high rates of false-positives and -negatives. Like mammograms, biopsies aren’t discriminatory and cannot distinguish between benign and malignant tumour cells.¹³⁷

      As with all medical tests, biopsies also aren’t without dangers. The biggest potential risk is when the doctor misses, and punctures the organ itself or ones that sit nearby. For instance, one in three cases of a lung biopsy cause collapse of the lung,¹³⁸ and one in 1,000 liver biopsies damage the gallbladder, causing a fatal peritonitis from bile leaking into the abdomen.СКАЧАТЬ