Edward Heath: The Authorised Biography. Philip Ziegler

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ the new chairman of the Conservative Party, expressing their misgivings about the present leadership. Macleod and Walker in particular, alleged du Cann, were lobbying against Douglas-Home – ‘unknown to Heath, I dare say, though one could not be sure’.³⁶ Heath himself always vehemently rejected any such insinuation. He could make a good case in his own defence. To correspondents who urged him to press his candidature he replied that any speculation on such lines was playing into the hands of Harold Wilson; ‘the best service any of us can give to the party is to give full and loyal support to the leader’.³⁷ But he cannot have been wholly unaware of what his supporters were doing, if not in his name then at least on his behalf. Nor could he deny that he was positioning himself so that if Douglas-Home did retire he would be well placed to challenge for the succession. Nigel Fisher claimed that some of the preliminary meetings ‘designed to put him in an advantageous position should Douglas-Home decide to go’ were held in Heath’s flat in Albany. Over this period he at least twice entertained influential political journalists to lunch à deux. ‘If there were a leadership contest now I think you’d probably win it,’ said one of them. Heath considered the proposition. ‘You may be right,’ he concluded. He had no need to play a more active part himself; it was all happening without his personal intervention. As Chateaubriand said of the duc d’Orléans, he ‘did not conspire in fact, but by consent’. The worst of which Heath can be accused is that he could have called off the dogs of war. He chose not to do so.³⁸

      Douglas-Home himself never blamed Heath for his behaviour. ‘Ted was very unhappy in case people thought that he was trying to undermine me,’ he told Heath’s biographer, George Hutchinson. ‘I am quite sure he was not.’ His wife, Elizabeth, was less charitable. She made no secret of the fact that she felt Heath had been indelicately quick in letting himself be drafted as the next leader. ‘The fact’, commented Rhodes James, ‘that the principal architects of Sir Alec’s removal were also those of Heath’s subsequent campaign for the leadership left an aftertaste of bitterness in some parts of the party.’³⁹

      The plotters were pushing at an open door. Douglas-Home had no intention of continuing to lead a party which was not substantially behind him. On 22 July 1965 he summoned Selwyn Lloyd to his office and said: ‘I am going to let you down. I have decided to chuck my hand in and give up the leadership.’ Later the same day he announced his intention to the 1922 Committee. ‘The “rotters” eleven has won,’ snarled one knight of the shires angrily, but the feeling of the majority was some relief and a regretful acceptance of the inevitable. At once interest switched to the election of a successor. Macleod, knowing only too well his unpopularity in certain sections of the party, accepted that he must be a non-starter. Maudling and Heath were the obvious front-runners. Christopher Soames urged Selwyn Lloyd to stand: ‘He felt very much that the bulk of the party did not want either Maudling or Heath and there should be a third candidate.’ Quintin Hogg agreed that 60 per cent of the party were looking for someone else; after his experiences at the last leadership election he had no intention of himself standing again but he, too, would have backed Lloyd. Lloyd, after some reflection, decided he would not stand unless there was something near a dead heat on the first ballot and a bitter conflict would otherwise ensue. Whitelaw agreed that this was a proper course of action. Harold Macmillan let it be known that he thought it should either be Heath or Maudling: ‘That was the type of person they wanted, the age they wanted and it was no use kicking against the pricks.’ Peter Thorneycroft at first insisted that, whatever happened, he would compete himself because ‘he thought he was a better man than either of the other two’; after much persuasion he accepted that he would secure only a handful of votes and decided not to stand. Enoch Powell alone remained in the race, presumably so as to lay down a marker for the future. In effect it was to be a straight race between Heath and Maudling.⁴⁰

      Maudling was the favourite at the start. He had the greater experience, had for some time been treated as deputy leader, was widely popular in the House. But his very popularity seemed to count against him: Home had been popular but Home had failed to hold his own; perhaps someone rougher, more abrasive, would better suit the need? The press for the most part favoured Heath. Cecil King, proprietor of the Daily Mirror, liked both men but he believed that Heath was ‘a positive force – a leader…certainly the best available man to be Tory PM’. More remarkably he told Heath that Beaverbrook felt the same: a striking tribute given the differences between the two men over Europe, though Maudling too was stamped in Beaverbrook’s eyes as a dangerous Europhile. Of the Tory grandees Lord Avon was noncommittal; Macmillan was decidedly for Heath – ‘I feel sure that Ted is the best choice. He is a stronger character than Maudling’. Home was equivocal; he told Michael King ‘he would have preferred Reggie: he thought lazy men came off better in a crisis’, but to Selwyn Lloyd he ‘made it pretty clear that he himself was going to vote for Heath’. Probably the most important single voice was that of Iain Macleod. If he had stood he would have gained some forty-five votes; though he made no attempt to control the way his supporters cast their votes it was well known that he favoured Heath: almost to a man, the Macleodites plumped for Heath. But for those votes, Maudling would have won. ‘It was in character,’ du Cann wrote balefully. ‘Macleod had let down Alec, now he let down Reggie. Macleod was to have his reward: Heath made him Shadow Chancellor.’ Both Margaret Thatcher and Keith Joseph were warmly in Heath’s favour. ‘I was a Heath man,’ said Joseph. ‘He had been very good to me…listening to me. He had the right ideas on management. I remember the sheer excitement when he won.’⁴¹

      Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.

      Текст предоставлен ООО «ЛитРес».

      Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на ЛитРес.

      Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.

/9j/4QAYRXhpZgAASUkqAAgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP/sABFEdWNreQABAAQAAABkAAD/4QN0aHR0cDov L25zLmFkb2JlLmNvbS94YXAvMS4wLwA8P3hwYWNrZXQgYmVnaW49Iu+7vyIgaWQ9Ilc1TTBNcENl aGlIenJlU3pOVGN6a2M5ZCI/PiA8eDp4bXBtZXRhIHhtbG5zOng9ImFkb2JlOm5zOm1ldGEvIiB4 OnhtcHRrPSJBZG9iZSBYTVAgQ29yZSA1LjAtYzA2MCA2MS4xMzQ3NzcsIDIwMTAvMDIvMTItMTc6 MzI6MDAgICAgICAgICI+IDxyZGY6UkRGIHhtbG5zOnJkZj0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMTk5 OS8wMi8yMi1yZGYtc3ludGF4LW5zIyI+IDxyZGY6RGVzY3JpcHRpb24gcmRmOmFib3V0PSIiIHht bG5zOnhtcFJpZ2h0cz0iaHR0cDovL25zLmFkb2JlLmNvbS94YXAvMS4wL3JpZ2h0cy8iIHhtbG5z OnhtcE1NPSJodHRwOi8vbnMuYWRvYmUuY29tL3hhcC8xLjAvbW0vIiB4bWxuczpzdFJlZj0iaHR0 cDovL25zLmFkb2JlLmNvbS94YXAvMS4wL3NUeXBlL1Jlc291cmNlUmVmIyIgeG1sbnM6eG1wPSJo dHRwOi8vbnMuYWRvYmUuY29tL3hhcC8xLjAvIiB4bXBSaWdodHM6TWFya2VkPSJGYWxzZSIgeG1w TU06RG9jdW1lbnRJRD0ieG1wLmRpZDo0NzJBNDI4MkNENzMxMUUwQUQyQzhEMENGQzg0NjI5QSIg eG1wTU06SW5zdGFuY2VJRD0ieG1wLmlpZDo0NzJBNDI4MUNENzMxMUUwQUQyQzhEMENGQzg0NjI5 QSIgeG1wOkNyZWF0b3JUb29sPSJBZG9iZSBQaG90b3Nob3AgQ1MyIE1hY2ludG9zaCI+IDx4bXBN TTpEZXJpdmVkRnJvbSBzdFJlZjppbnN0YW5jZUlEPSJ1dWlkOjc2OURGOTg3NzdDODExRTBCRkU4 OTk0RkZEMkVDRjMyIiBzdFJlZjpkb2N1bWVudElEPSJ1dWlkOjNDRjNDMzlBNzdDODExRTBCRkU4 OTk0RkZEMkVDRjMyIi8+IDwvcmRmOkRlc2NyaXB0aW9uPiA8L3JkZjpSREY+IDwveDp4bXBtZXRh PiA8P3hwYWNrZXQgZW5kPSJyIj8+/+4ADkFkb2JlAGTAAAAAAf/bAIQAAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEB AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQICAgICAgICAgICAwMDAwMDAwMDAwEBAQEBAQEC СКАЧАТЬ