Mr Good Enough: The case for choosing a Real Man over holding out for Mr Perfect. Lori Gottlieb

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ mother’s friends who had married in their twenties about this middle ground, they said the problem they’ve seen in their kids’ generation is that the middle ground doesn’t exist.

      “I hear constantly from my daughter’s friends that they want men to have the same emotions they do, but men and women express emotion differently,” said Susan, who has two daughters in their thirties. “Young women expect men to be soft and caring and rich and gorgeous—they want everything.”

      Connie shook her head. “You can wait for Prince Charming,” she said, “but even Prince Charming will have holes in his socks. You can marry the most perfect person in the world and you’ll still have problems to work through. But once young women see those holes, they’re no longer interested.”

      “Our expectations were different,” said Melinda. “We expected to have disagreements. You didn’t go in thinking, ‘I’ll get married and if it doesn’t work out, we’ll get divorced.’ There’s a sense of being a team. You were committed to working it out. Today’s girls always think they’ll find something better.”

      Of the group, none of the moms believed in the concept of your soul mate being the only person on the planet you were meant to be with. To them, a soul mate meant someone you have a deep connection with, someone who accepts you for who you are and vice versa, someone who is there for you at the end of the day.

      “I think going through difficult times together makes you feel like soul mates,” said Kathryn. “Working through an illness, a financial issue, a parent’s death.”

      “People don’t expect to work in relationships today,” June added. “There have been phases of our marriage when both of us needed things at the same time, and that could be very challenging. But I think a lot of women nowadays expect that they’ll always get every single one of their needs met and if they don’t, something’s wrong. Nothing’s wrong—that’s just the nature of two people being in a relationship.”

      I asked them what women should give up if they want to find a good mate.

      “I don’t know that you’d have to give up anything—don’t start off with the negative!” Diane said. “Women today start off with that mind-set—they have a long list of what they want and think they have to cross things off of it. Why not just look for someone you enjoy being with and see where it goes? Start off from a place of optimism instead of what the guy might be lacking.”

      Kathryn agreed. “I have a very dear friend who has single girls,” she said. “I wanted one of them to meet a young attorney who’s smart and funny and donates time to kids. She Googled him, found a photo, and said he wasn’t good-looking enough. She wouldn’t even meet him. Girls today are stopping relationships from happening before they even have an opportunity to develop. There’s a romanticized expectation of being swept off your feet from the get-go and sustaining that level of excitement, but the way love happens is over time.”

      That’s how it happened for Connie. “I didn’t even like my husband when I met him,” she said. “I was working in fashion and he was schlubby. He was sort of an oddball. He asked me out and I didn’t want to go out with him. But he was persistent and as I got to know him, he not only turned out to be a wonderful guy, but he turned out to be the love of my life.”

      The more I spoke to people about relationships—younger single women, older single women, married women, single men, married men, and women from my mother’s generation—the more I found myself asking the same questions: How did the search for love get so confusing, and was this modern way of dating making women happy?

2 The Romantic Comedy That Predicted My Future

      I was 20 years old when I first saw the movie Broadcast News, but little did I know that it would predict my future. Holly Hunter plays Jane, a single network news producer whose best friend is her talented and witty colleague Aaron, played by Albert Brooks. They talk on the phone late at night, finish each other’s sentences, laugh at the same things, and understand each other the way nobody else does. Aaron, who is smart, funny, and kind, is in love with Jane, but Jane falls for Tom, the handsome but shallow newscaster played by William Hurt. Tom, who’s all about style over substance, stands for everything Jane rails against. Jane is drawn to him anyway. In the end, she realizes that she can’t compromise her values enough to be with Tom—nor can she compromise enough to be with Aaron. She loves Aaron deeply, but she doesn’t feel any fireworks.

      We’ve all been there, haven’t we?

      Jane’s dilemma—the choice between fireworks and friendship— may seem age-old, but it’s not. The internal struggle might be, but the freedom for women to choose not just one or the other, but neither, is relatively new. Instead of picking Aaron or Tom, Jane decides to wait for Mr. Right, who, incidentally, never shows up. At the end of the movie, when we see these characters seven years later, Jane vaguely mentions that she’s dating a guy, but so what? What are the odds that this relationship will work out, given that she’s probably been in several relationships in the past seven years that seemed promising but didn’t pan out? Besides, who’s to say that this guy is better-suited for her than Aaron, her emotional and intellectual soul mate? Meanwhile, we learn that Aaron is married with a son, and Tom is engaged.

      It’s a sad ending, but when I was 20, I didn’t question whether Jane had made the right decision. That Jane ended up unmarried and childless, well, I chalked that up to—get this—the filmmaker’s misogyny! I’m not kidding. I’m completely embarrassed by this now, but I actually had conversations with female friends about how Hollywood wasn’t ready to show a strong woman standing her ground without somehow punishing her for it. It never occurred to us that this was simply a likely outcome to Jane’s choice. In fact, many of us went through our twenties and thirties making that very same choice—Prince Charming or nobody!—and ending up single.

      What my friends and I called “misogyny” turned out to be “reality.”

      It wasn’t until I watched the DVD in my late thirties that I realized I’d become Jane, passing up the Aarons of the world only to appreciate too late that what I want most in a partner is an Aaron. But like Aaron in the film, those guys my friends and I passed up earlier had gotten married.

      At 20, I remember thinking that the saddest moment in the film was when Aaron confesses to Jane, “And I’m in love with you. How do you like that? I buried the lead.” My heart broke for Aaron.

      Two decades later, the saddest moment for me was when a heartbroken Aaron predicts the consequences of Jane’s rejecting him for the charming but shallow Tom: “Six years from now, I’ll be back here with my wife and two kids. And I’ll see you, and one of my kids will say, ‘Daddy, who is that?’ And I’ll say, ‘It’s not nice to point at single fat women.’ “ Now my heart broke for Jane. I knew how truthful Aaron’s cutting remark could be.

       A BETTER-LOOKING BILLY CRYSTAL

      A couple of years after Broadcast News came out, When Harry Met Sally hit theaters. This time, best friends do fall in love. There was something incredibly romantic about the idea of, Hey, wait a minute, take a second look at the guy who’s your buddy. But still, back in my twenties, I wasn’t interested in the Billy Crystals of my world. Again, stupidly, my friends and I considered this message insulting. Why should someone like Meg Ryan lower her standards? In real life, we asked, would someone as beautiful as Sally go for someone like Harry? Probably not. He’d have a crush on her, and she’d say she just wants to be friends.

      But СКАЧАТЬ