Recognizing and Engaging Employees For Dummies. Nelson Bob

Чтение книги онлайн.

       One size does not fit all

      Another challenge of engagement programs is the tendency to have a one-size-fits-all approach to engagement and, particularly, to recognition. Companies put in cool programs to drive engagement that are created around the things the person or committee planning the programs finds motivating. Yet, research shows that no motivation strategy or incentive tends to appeal to more than 40 percent of a typical company’s employee population. And often, the organization only has the budget to create a recognition program that can appeal to 70 percent of the employee population.

      Engagement strategies thus need to be individualized around the personal motivations of each employee, and every manager needs to make the necessary connection with those employees that report to him or her. If you hire a workforce that is universally motivated and engaged by the same approach, that is great, but when does that ever happen in real life? Many companies assume everyone is motivated equally by the same things (such as greater pay), which we know is not the case at all.

       Management of change is too complex

      As you look at the key factors that impact employee engagement (refer to the earlier section “Looking at Factors Impacting Employee Engagement”), they are each relatively clear and are elements that you can easily focus on for improvement. Often, however, managers and executives make two key mistakes:

      The result of these errors? The impact of any actions taken become blurred or diminished, and the degree of complexity explodes. The problem is compounded when you overlay the solution on your organization’s annual planning and budgeting process, and the speed of change grinds to a halt.

      To combat these tendencies, select one thing to focus on and do it right. Clearly focus on a critical area for improvement and then strive to make true inroads in changing that dimension. You’ll move much closer to being a culture of engagement if you do a deep dive on just one variable and stick with it over a significant period of time rather than trying to improve a dozen variables across the board. The further your focus drifts from the variables you are specifically measuring, the fuzzier the results you are apt to obtain, and you’ll end up about where you started, with no discernable improvement, year after year.

      

Much has been made over the years of the service-profit chain model where engaged employees lead to engaged customers. However, what is often overlooked is the reverse of this relationship. One research study showed customer satisfaction impacted employee engagement at a much greater rate than the opposite. If an otherwise engaged, motivated employee is constantly dealing with frustrated customers, the employee’s engagement level drops quickly. Gallup used to say that if you put a good employee in a bad system, the system wins every time. Employee surveys often ignore these cultural aspects and focus more on the employee’s internal satisfaction. For example, are employees empowered to resolve customer concerns on the first contact? Are employees forced to deal with policies that frustrate customers? Do salespeople promise things they can’t deliver? These, and other cultural factors, can make or break employee engagement.

      The best way to think about planning, executing, and improving engagement is a concept I draw from the work of W. Edwards Deming and the total quality management movement. It’s called the Shewhart Cycle, and I’ve adopted it here as the PDRI cycle, which stands for “Plan, Do, Review, and Improve.” Read on to find out how it applies to improving your engagement culture and head to Chapter 8 for more details on this approach.

       Plan

      When you think of planning, you likely envision something elaborate and well-documented, but that is not necessarily what I’m talking about here. A plan can also simply be a desire or intention to take a particular action. You might just ask yourself the question, “If we could do one thing to most improve our department’s or organization’s effectiveness, what would that be?” or “How can I best make a motivational impact on my employee or work group?” Obviously, the more complex the activity, the more important a formal plan will be, but regardless of the complexity, the greater the commitment to action you have, the more likely the plan will be implemented.

      Start with the end in mind. What is the end-state that you want to create in your organization? Focus on desired behaviors and actions needed to move toward that end state. Create measures that will track progress toward your desired end state.

      

Until a skill or behavior is habitual, some planning is necessary. Although about 80 percent of our behaviors are habitual and require little or no thought, all new behaviors require at least some amount of advance thought, planning, and commitment to instill the behavior in individual practice.

       Do

      Doing turns intention into action. Many people have good intentions but never follow through on them. If intentions alone were sufficient, everybody would be successful! The best performers understand the difference between intention and performance; they are action-oriented. They know that without focused action everything is just theory. Although their actions at first might be ineffective, they know that it is important to get the learning-by-doing process started. As the famous Nike advertising slogan proclaims, “Just do it!” Systematically recognize and reinforce those behaviors and actions that you’ve identified could most impact the success of your goals.

       Review

      After you have engaged in a recognition activity, review it to see what kind of effect it is having. Gaining feedback through a program review is a critical step in the learning process. A review answers such questions as

      With an evaluation incorporating the metrics you established beforehand, access what worked well and what didn’t. This review can be elaborate or very simple. Sometimes you’ll do this review yourself, based on direct observation, and sometimes it can be a larger evaluation effort that a group takes on with input from employees, management, and any service providers that may be helping you.

      After your review, you can do one of three things: Stop giving recognition (fortunately, most people will not choose this option), continue to give it exactly the same way going forward (this option means you felt your efforts were successful), or decide to learn from your experience and improve the way you give recognition to others (the most likely scenario).

      

Success is an opportunity for positive reinforcement, but we usually learn more from behaviors that fall short of the mark, so failure is an opportunity to learn and improve.

       Improve

      In this step, you implement the lessons you received during your review, making improvements in your own performance. The more you engage in an activity, review the results of your actions, and improve on them, the better you become at that СКАЧАТЬ