Название: Impact Investment
Автор: Allman Keith А.
Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited
Жанр: Зарубежная образовательная литература
isbn: 9781119009818
isbn:
Debt investors need to pay special attention to the inflationary aspect of the business cycle. If debt investors offer a fixed-rate product, they could introduce the concept of basis risk, defined as a risk caused by a mismatch between fixed and floating interest rates. For instance, if the investor is a local debt fund that pays its investors a floating rate return, but offers fixed rate debt to investees, there could be a mismatch, depending on how the business cycle evolves. If debt was issued to an investee at the bottom of a recession, when interest rates might be very low in order to spur growth, and then the growth phase proceeds quickly where rates start rising, the debt fund will incur margin compression. The yield from the investee will be fixed low and the amount the debt fund must pay its investors will increase. Most funds would invest in hedges, but these can be expensive.
Foreign Exchange Risk
Whether globally or locally based, investors often have to contend with foreign exchange (forex) risk. This is the risk that movements in currency exchange rates may impact the investor directly through a conversion into or out of a currency different than the one the investor is funded in, or indirectly through the invested company's operational exposure to foreign exchange.
Direct forex risk can occur at multiple points in an investors' investment horizon. For equity investors, it can occur at the time of investment and at the time of exit. For debt investors, it can occur at the time of investment, during interest payments, and during principal amortization. Debt investors typically hedge against forex risks, but equity investors have a difficult time. The difficulty for equity investors to hedge foreign exchange risk is caused by the fact that they do not know the duration or how much to hedge against. Equity investors may have to hold their investment for many years until exit, making long-term hedging extremely costly. Also, since an exit amount can vary wildly from investment to investment, the exact amount to hedge for exit is difficult to pinpoint. An equity investor can easily be over or under hedged.
If an equity investor does choose to take on direct currency risk and invest in a currency that is different from its funded currency, then she should research the foreign currency volatility and how future movements might affect returns. To understand this better the following two points of direct forex risk for an equity investor should be analyzed in detail: investment and exit.
Direct forex risk at investment can occur when an investment is agreed upon and analysis done at an exchange rate that changes between the time the funds are actually disbursed. Often, after agreeing on an investment valuation and ownership stake it could take a number of weeks before definitive documentation is negotiated and finalized. During this time, if a foreign currency is volatile, there could be risk of loss.
To understand this further, open the file FX_IRR.xlsx from the website and select the Investment sheet. Starting in C11, there are data on the Brazilian real from August 2013 to the end of October 2013. The Brazilian real was noticeably volatile during this time. The example that has been set up is an equity investor that agreed to invest BRL6 million assuming an investment valuation and ownership percentage set on August 4, 2013, but did not finalize and transmit funds until September 29, 2013. The equity investor would have completed return analyses at the August rate of BRL2.450 to USD, but would have actually invested at the September rate of BRL2.181 to USD. At BRL2.450 to USD the investor would have to convert USD2,449,170 to make the investment; however, after eight weeks the exchange rate has moved such that to invest the same BRL6 million the investor would have to invest USD2,751,511. Immediately, the investor has lost USD302,342. From an IRR perspective, ignoring exit exchange rate risk, if the investor assumed they could exit in 5 years for USD5 million, they would have immediately been down 2.65 percent IRR (i.e., difference between a potential 15.34 percent IRR assuming that was how much was converted, versus a 12.69 percent IRR caused by having to use more USD for investment due to the rate change) because of the exchange rate. Figure 2.6 shows the situation from the worksheet.
Figure 2.6 Between agreement and closure, the BRL appreciated causing a loss to the USD-funded investor.
Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.
Текст предоставлен ООО «ЛитРес».
Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на ЛитРес.
Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.
1
Yasemin Saltuk. J.P. Morgan, “Spotlight on the Market: The Impact Investor Survey,” Global Social Finance (May 2, 2014), 5.
2
Ibid., 6.
3
The Global Impact Inve
1
Yasemin Saltuk. J.P. Morgan, “Spotlight on the Market: The Impact Investor Survey,”
2
Ibid., 6.
3
The Global Impact Investing Network, “What is Impact Investing?” www.thegiin.org/cgi-bin/iowa/resources/about/index.html#1.
4
The World Bank Group, “Doing Business: Measuring Business Regulations.” www.doingbusiness.org.
5
While many immediately look to the emerging markets as the source of impact investments, there are investment strategies that focus on areas in need within developed economies, such as the East London Bond (www.eastlondonbond.org).
6
Advanced Excel users will notice that some of the formulas have complex look-up functions and refer to the Mapping sheet occasionally. This is because the data sets used countries with names that differed slightly or recognized countries that the other list did not.