Название: Accounting for Derivatives
Автор: Ramirez Juan
Издательство: Автор
Жанр: Зарубежная образовательная литература
isbn: 9781118817964
isbn:
Leveraged Financial Assets
In order to meet the contractual cash flows criterion, there should be no leverage of the contractual cash flows. Leverage increases the variability of the contractual cash flows, with the result that they do not have the economic characteristics of interest.
Non-recourse Financial Assets
IFRS 9 contains specific guidance on classifying non-recourse (or limited recourse) financial assets. These assets represent an investment in which the investor's claims are limited to specified assets, which may be financial or non-financial assets. IFRS 9 states that the fact that a financial asset is non-recourse does not mean in itself that the SPPI criterion is not met.
• If, for instance, the underlying assets meet the SPPI criterion, it may be possible to conclude that the non-recourse asset also meets the criterion.
• If, for example, the non-recourse asset is a vehicle whose only asset is an equity investment, it will not meet the SPPI criterion.
Contractually Linked Instruments – Tranches of Securitisations
IFRS 9 contains specific guidance on classifying contractually linked instruments that create concentrations of credit risk (e.g., securitisation tranches). The right to payments on more junior tranches depends on the issuer's generation of sufficient cash flows to pay more senior tranches. The standard requires a look-through approach to determine whether the SPPI criterion is met. Otherwise, the tranche would be recognised at fair value.
A tranche meets the SPPI criterion only if all the following conditions are met:
Principal and interest test. The contractual terms of the tranche itself have only SPPI characteristics.
Look-through test. The underlying pool of financial instruments:
contains one or more instruments that meet the SPPI criterion;
also may contain instruments that:
reduce the cash flow variability of the instruments under (i) and the combined cash flows meet the SPPI criterion (e.g., interest rate caps and floors, credit protection), or
align the cash flows of the tranches with the cash flows of the instruments under (i) arising as a result of differences in whether interest rates are fixed or floating or the currency or timing of cash flows.
Credit risk test. The exposure to credit risk inherent in the tranche is equal to, or lower than, the exposure to credit risk of the underlying pool of financial instruments. The standard states as an example that this condition would be met if, in all circumstances in which the underlying pool of instruments loses 50 % as a result of credit losses, the tranche would lose 50 % or less.
The look-through approach is carried through to the underlying pool of instruments that create, rather than pass through, the cash flows. For example, if an entity invests in a tranched note issued by SPE 2 whose only asset is an investment in another tranched note issued by SPE 1, the entity looks through to the assets of SPE 1 in performing the assessment.
Example: Tranched issuance
Suppose that a special-purpose entity (SPE) has bought mortgage assets with a notional amount of USD 800 million and issued three tranched notes (A, B and C) that are contractually linked. All assets in the pool meet the SPPI criterion. The underlying mortgage assets pay fixed rates of interest on a monthly basis. The vehicle holds an interest rate swap that swaps the underlying mortgages monthly fixed interest for 3-month Libor. The weighted average credit spread of the assets in the mortgage pool is 400 basis points.
• Tranche A pays a quarterly interest of 3-month Libor plus 50 basis points on a principal of USD 300 million.
• Tranche B pays a quarterly interest of 3-month Libor plus 400 basis points on a principal of USD 200 million.
• Tranche C pays a quarterly interest of 3-month Libor plus 500 basis points on a principal of USD 100 million.
If the underlying pool of instruments were to lose 50 % as a result of credit losses, a loss of USD 400 million would arise (=800 million × 50 %), and the effect on the tranches would be as follows:
• The overcollateralisation would absorb the first USD 200 million losses.
• Tranche C would lose USD 100 million, representing 100 % of its total principal.
• Tranche B would lose USD 100 million, representing 50 % of its total principal.
• Tranche A would not experience any losses.
In addition to the tranches and the asset pool, the vehicle contains another financial instrument, an interest rate swap, but it only aligns the cash flows of the underlying pool with those of the tranches, and consequently it does not affect the tranches' SPPI eligibility. Whilst all the three tranches meet two of the SPPI conditions (i.e., the underlying mortgage pool meets the SPPI criterion and the tranches pay cash flows that only represent principal and interest), only tranches A and B are eligible for amortised cost recognition, subject to meeting the business model criterion, as a 50 % loss in the underlying asset pool would not cause these tranches to experience losses exceeding 50 % of their principal amounts. As a result, the larger the level of overcollateralisation (i.e., the excess of the underlying pool size relative to the size of the issued tranches), the higher the likelihood of meeting the credit risk test.
(*) Subject to the business model criterion being met
When the tranche held by the investor is prepayable contingent upon a prepayment occurring in the pool of underlying assets, it may meet SPPI even if the following features exist in the structure (assuming the three primary conditions for the tranche as a whole are met):
• The tranche is prepayable contingent on repayment occurring in the underlying pool. Because SPPI must be met for the underlying pool, it is assumed the underlying prepayment risk on the pool is consistent with SPPI.
• Even if the collateral underlying the pool does not meet the qualifying conditions for amortised cost, the underlying collateral can be disregarded unless the instrument was acquired with the intention of controlling the collateral.
IFRS 9 requires an entity to reclassify financial assets if and only if the objective of the entity's business model for managing those assets changes. Such changes are expected to be infrequent, and need to be determined by the entity's senior management as a result of internal or external modifications. These modifications have to be significant to the entity's operations and demonstrable to external parties. Reclassification is applied prospectively from the start of the first reporting period following the change in business model.
Both the amortised cost and FVOCI categories require the effective interest rate to be determined at initial recognition. Therefore, when reclassifying a financial asset between the amortised cost and the FVOCI categories, the recognition of interest income would not change and the entity would continue to use the effective interest rate determined at initial recognition. A financial asset reclassified out of the FVOCI category to the amortised cost category would be measured at amortised cost as if it had СКАЧАТЬ