Название: Erotic Fantasy
Автор: Hans-Jürgen Döpp
Издательство: Parkstone International Publishing
Жанр: Иностранные языки
Серия: Temporis
isbn: 978-1-78310-751-3, 978-1-78042-976-2
isbn:
“Unhappy the man who has never fucked a boy or treated his girlfriend as a boy! For anyone who has experienced neither the one nor the other, debauchery is still virgin territory” (Justine). In 120 Days, de Sade writes; “O precious arses, upon your altar I swear never again to stray from you.” For writers in classical antiquity, homage to this part of the body was a variation on the theme of sensual pleasure, but de Sade experienced it as “excess”, as expressed by Bataille.[47] The blasphemous intention is obvious. Coeur-de-Fer instructs Justine, “Many father confessors have trodden this pilgrims’ path, without anyone’s parents being aware of it. Do I need to say any more, Justine? If this temple is the most secret, it is also the most pleasurable.”
As recently as a century after de Sade and Goethe, the idea had already become anathema. Such pleasures suffocated under bourgeois morality, by which the Psychopathia Sexualis was very much influenced. Krafft-Ebing’s[48] air stood on end: “One hideous phenomenon is the paedicatio mulierum, in some circumstances even uxorum! Libertines sometimes do it for particular titillation with prostitutes or even with their own wives. There are examples of men who sometimes have anal intercourse with their wives!” All that remains of the breadth of humanistic education is bad schoolboy Latin. What was previously an enjoyable variant of sexual behaviour was now classified as a perversion. The previous condemnation of anal intercourse under Christianity had become a quasi-scientific condemnation, introduced under the cover of Enlightenment.
Are we experiencing a new Renaissance today, as far as sexuality is concerned? One of our aims in life, apart from career success, is to have a fulfilling sex life. We have a less rigid upbringing, with the result that anality is no longer so vehemently condemned. The pressure of Christian sexual morality has given way to a “morality of negotiation” between partners; whatever gives pleasure is permitted, as long as there is mutual consent.
45. Jean Morisot, 1925.
46. Marcel Vertés, 1938.
A culture of bisexuality is developing which is opening up the one-way street of heterosexual intercourse to traffic in the opposite direction. The image of a “boyish” posterior is idealised, at least within European culture, and men and women promise equal pleasures “from behind” – this is reinforced by fashions which minimise the differences between the sexes. Is there going to be a cultural reconciliation with our “part maudite”?[49] This poem by Hans Magnus Enzensberger[50] may be an indication of the future:
Shit
I often hear people talk about it
As though everything were its fault.
But look how gently and modestly
It takes its place among us!
So why do we sully
Its good name
And bestow it
On the President of the USA,
On the cops, on war
And on capitalism?
How transitory it is,
And how permanent
Everything we give its name to!
It is yielding,
But when we talk about it
We mean exploiters.
Is this now
How we express our anger?
Has it not relieved us?
Soft
And curiously powerless
It is probably
The most peaceful action of humanity.
What has it ever done to us?
Or, as Mozart put it, “Our arses should be signs of peace!”
47. Anonymous, 1900.
Feet-Ishism
“Find me a ribbon from her bosom,
48. Cold-painted bronze dating from the end of the 19th century.
Every lover is also somewhat of an erotic fetishist. He, or she, loves objects that have been in close or intimate contact with the beloved and thus are especially dear. These objects ensure the proximity and closeness of the beloved. Special physical forms of expression of this desired person can also become a symbol for the significance of the partner as a loved and cherished individual: a way of walking, a way of smiling, “the way you wear your hat, the way you sip your tea.” Physical characteristics such as hair colour, shape of eyes and mouth, clothing, etc. can constitute the cause, the movens, of being in love. Today, a value such as youth itself seems to have turned into an overvalued fetish. As long as these concrete and physical symbols represent the totality of the loved individual, one can speak of a “normal fetish”.
However, there are forms in which the sexual partner disappears completely behind the symbol, sometimes to the extent that the symbol is stripped of its symbolic character and becomes the sexual trigger and stimulus itself. This is what occurs when items of clothing, especially shoes, stockings, handkerchiefs, and underwear play a significant role.
In classical literature cases are known when handkerchiefs, clothing, money purses, and braids are snatched from their owners through violence and trickery to satisfy a sexual motive, while orgasm occurs in part during the act of purloining, in part through masturbation when subsequently viewing, or handling the fetish.
All of these objects are charged with magical powers similar to the “holy relics” of Christianity and the amulets of so-called “indigenous tribes.” The term applied to the phenomenon of fetishism also has its roots in ethnology. During the fifteenth and sixteenth century, when the Portuguese in West Africa noticed the reverence and veneration with which the local natives treated such objects as stones, sticks, and idols, they compared these objects with amulets or talismans and called them “feiticio” [Italian: “fetisso”] or “magic,” a word which is derived from the Latin “factitius” [of magic power]. This magical thinking, which also penetrated the cults of Christian religion, corresponds with a deep human need. Those who are aware of the close relationship between religious and erotic sensations and feelings understand that fetishist imagery also occurs frequently in love.
The Frenchman A. Binet was the first to describe sexual fetishism in his 1877 article Du fétichisme dans l’amour. The few mentioned examples of fetishist objects already illustrate how much the fetishes themselves depend on current fashions. The braids of old have been cut off a long time ago and a paper Kleenex will hardly become an object feverishly desired by a lover. Shoe and foot fetishism has been influenced by fashion as well. When women still wore long skirts with their feet every so often accidentally peeking out from underneath, it was literally a “fiendish joy” to steal a glance at an ankle and shoe. СКАЧАТЬ
47
Marcus V. Martial, lived from c. 40–102 AD in Bilbilis (Spain) and for a while in Rome; poet.
48
Oscar F. O’Flahertie Wills Wilde, b. 16.10.1854, Dublin, d. 30.11.1900, Paris; Irish dramatist and narrative write.
49
Shere D. Hite, b. 1942, USA; sociologist who has made studies of human sexual behaviour.
50
Alfred C. Kinsey, b. 23.6.1894, Hoboken (USA), d. 25.8.1956, Bloomington; zoologist and sexologist.