Early Italian Painting. Joseph Archer Crowe
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Early Italian Painting - Joseph Archer Crowe страница 8

Название: Early Italian Painting

Автор: Joseph Archer Crowe

Издательство: Parkstone International Publishing

Жанр: Иностранные языки

Серия: Art of Century

isbn: 978-1-78310-392-8

isbn:

СКАЧАТЬ the models that first shaped his designs, but the fact that he was able to achieve the advance which gave him repute through utilizing the background and techniques available to him. There are no intrinsically Greek elements in his art, which he simply evolved out of the rough Italian materials which have been examined in the works of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries. It is impossible to objectively countenance the belief that better skill in painting could have been found amongst the Greeks than amongst the Italians of the age of Cimabue.

      It is sufficient that we shall be able to agree with Vasari in thinking that Cimabue was the first Italian who gave an impulse to progress in the arts of drawing and painting at a time when both were in a state of atrophy. It may be that he was not only sensible of the necessity for a change, but proud of having helped to bring it on. We read in the Purgatorio how conscious he was of holding the field which Giotto later wrested from him. In light of the commentary regarding his destruction of even slightly criticised works, the apparent admiration of his contemporaries was such that the occurrence of such an action is hard to imagine. Either way, it is definitely in contrast with the popular local anecdote of the region, according to which the Madonna Rucellai (a work erroneously ascribed to him for centuries), when finished, was so admired that when taken to its place of exhibition in Santa Maria Novella, it was carried in procession preceded by a band of trumpeteers, only after the mightiest lords and patricians of Florence had been invited to see it in the painter’s rooms. It can now be found in the Galleria degli Uffizi in Florence.[2]

      Cimabue, Saint John the Evangelist, c. 1301–1302.

      Mosaic. Apse, Cathedral of Pisa, Pisa.

      Cimabue, Crucifix, c. 1272. 336 × 267 cm.

      Church of San Domenico, Arezzo.

      It is equally difficult to assign a date to the beginning of Cimabue’s independent practice as a painter and to say when the Madonna of Santa Maria Novella was first placed on the altar, where it continues to stand. “We must be content to accept the fact that, for the time in which it was executed, the Madonna Rucellai is a masterpiece.”

      In this great and important picture, the Virgin is represented in a red tunic and blue mantle, her feet rest on an open-worked stool and she sits on a chair hung with a white drapery flowered in gold and blue, supported by six angels kneeling in threes above each other. A delicately engraved nimbus surrounds her head and that of the infant Christ on her lap, who is dressed in a white tunic and purple mantle shot with gold. A dark-coloured frame surrounds the picture and its gables, which are delicately traced with an ornament and interrupted at intervals by thirty medallions on gold backgrounds, each of which contains the half-figure of a saint. The face of the Madonna is marked by a tender and melancholy expression, the infant is well-shaped and not wanting in animation; the group displays a rare amount of maternal affection. The attitudes of the angels, the movement of the heads, and the elegance with which the hair is wound around the cinctures, falling in locks on the neck, are all pleasing to the eye. The energetic mien of some prophets is striking. There is a certain loss of balance, caused by the weight of the Virgin’s head as compared with the slightness of her frame. The features are designed in a way typical to the thirteenth century, softened, as regards the expression of the eye, by closed lids and an exaggeration of elliptical form in the iris. The nose starts from a bony protuberance, and is depressed at the end; the mouth and chin are, as usual, small and prim. In Christ, the same coarse nose is united to a half-open mouth and large, staring eyes, with features which may be considered too masculine and square. The hands of both Virgin and Child are remarkable for the length of the tapered fingers, their wide separation near the palm and the stiffness of their articulations; the feet are quite conventional in shape. In the grouping of the angels, the absence of all true notions of composition is striking. Their frames are slight for the heads, though their movements are more natural and pleasing than those of earlier artists. In the setting of drapery, Cimabue shows no sensible progress, but he softens the hardness of the fine engraved outlines, and he gives the flesh-tints a clear and carefully fused colour, imparting the surfaces with some of the rotundity which they had lost. With him vanish the old contrasts of half tones and shades. He abandons line shadowing for a careful stippling which follows and develops form. He relieves the general verde underlayer with ruddy shadows and warm lights. A flush tinges without staining the cheeks and lips. Unity and harmony are provided by a system of final glazes, which, having now in part disappeared, exaggerate the paleness of the flesh. The draperies are painted in lively and transparent colours; reds, gently harmonising with the flesh, along with brilliant blues and rosy pinks. In ornamentation, there is more taste and a better subordination than older works.

      Cimabue, Saint Francis.

      Museo della Porziuncola, Church of Santa Maria degli Angeli, Assisi.

      From the date of this altarpiece, the Florentine school began to expand. Without it the superiority of Cimabue over his predecessors would remain unexplained, the principal link of artistic history in Florence would be lost and Giotto’s greatness would be difficult to understand. There are companion pictures to that of Santa Maria Novella – one at the Galleria degli Uffizi in Florence, another in the Louvre. For various reasons neither of them gives a totally unequivocal idea of the master.

      Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.

      Текст предоставлен ООО «ЛитРес».

      Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на ЛитРес.

      Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.

      Примечания

      1

      Franz Kugler, Handbook of the History of Painting. The Italian Schools

      2

      Note: It has since been discovered, through the emergence of a contract found in the records of Florence, that the Madonna Rucellai of Santa Maria Novella was in fact painted by Duccio in 1285, while the picture subject to the triumphal procession was a c

Примечания

1

Franz Kugler, Handbook of the History of Painting. The Italian Schools

2

Note: It has since been discovered, through the emergence of a contract found in the records of Florence, that the Madonna Rucellai of Santa Maria Novella was in fact painted by Duccio in 1285, while the picture subject to the triumphal procession was a certain Madonna Majesty, also by Duccio, which was taken from his workshop to the Opera del Duomo in Siena. It has also since been suggested that many of the paintings ascribed to Cimabue were probably Duccio’s, who was his contemporary ri СКАЧАТЬ



<p>2</p>

Note: It has since been discovered, through the emergence of a contract found in the records of Florence, that the Madonna Rucellai of Santa Maria Novella was in fact painted by Duccio in 1285, while the picture subject to the triumphal procession was a certain Madonna Majesty, also by Duccio, which was taken from his workshop to the Opera del Duomo in Siena. It has also since been suggested that many of the paintings ascribed to Cimabue were probably Duccio’s, who was his contemporary rival. These inconsistencies will be fully explained in successive sections.