Kazakhs and Turks. Almaz Braev
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу Kazakhs and Turks - Almaz Braev страница 9
Название: Kazakhs and Turks
Автор: Almaz Braev
Издательство: Издательские решения
isbn: 9785006035911
isbn:
The aristocracy is separated from relatives, so it is separated from the guardianship and egoism of equal zerefs. The aristocracy has taught conditionally related «hyenas» for a long time that there can be no former equality. It takes on the function of noble control, if necessary, provides, makes allowances, frees poor relatives, and takes on the function of patrons. (It is still possible to observe the release of the law of the «lord’s shoulder» and other benefits on behalf of some local leaders; this line is repeated by more minor government officials, who, they say, decided they grant the benefits for the poor). Thank you, my dears. I’ve had enough of equality, so I’ve had enough of the accompanying jealousy. From now on, I’m not unequal to you; get used to it. I’m an aristocrat, and I’m taller than you, freaks. The word freaks does not sound at this moment, but every dictator works as if he curses everyone and takes revenge. That’s what it is, not the surplus an iron plow obtains. Although formally, it is the iron plow that is guilty – it has strengthened, strengthened the sense of superiority. There is no turning back.
Chapter 13
How the Seljuk Turks appeared on the historical scene
If brothers by faith replace brothers by blood, what’s important about it?
The inability to form a strategic alliance (a permanent marker of savages) is not always a bad thing. History knows many such savage victories. (The savage who was behind can outrun any cultured smartass even now. This is a frequent occurrence. But the conservatives themselves lose from this). This requires favorable conditions. But for this, firstly, the system’s collapse is needed when problems in any state and even in the empire escalate. The invasion of the mass of savages may look treacherous as if the vultures feel the decomposition of the «corpse.» That’s not so. This does not mean that the savages did not have problems either. At this moment, the whole planet is covered with problems (at the same time, if I may say so, the situation of the global crisis is not only modernity, it has always been like this, but then there was no globality to make a clear picture out of chaos). In the state, everything is much more complicated. Nomads depended on nature, any jute (when not the steppe fodder for cattle), and end-nomads attacked neighbors. At this moment, all the conditional neighboring savages have no fewer problems – it’s not interesting to anyone. So, where are they to go? They go to the empire! Oh, how scary to us! But hunger is not a kind aunt. Thus, the Hyksos came to the Egyptians and captured Egypt of the XII dynasty – this is perhaps the first case of the nomads’ luck. Then the Visigoths entered Near Asia, the province of Rome – this is the second significant case – de facto, the collapse of the Roman Empire began. The Roman Empire is no joke. However, it was the barbarians who made the onslaught. Further-more).
What is the difference between the problems among the «brothers» and among the aristocracy? The crisis in the empire is usually associated with elite showdowns, and the brothers fight just like that (somewhere in the ass of them, it boiled over – it started playing, and the brothers fought – the usual savage case). In the early feudal state, even great empires perished under the blows of tribal unions, including nomads, which created a precedent for the «greatness» of the barbarians. This plays into the hands of modern nationalists: they say we were so great, we took Rome in the past. No one is interested in the reasons. The reasons for the superiority of a friendly gang of robbers over the gentlemen. That all barbarians have to go exactly the same way from barbarism to civilization is no longer interesting to anyone. The main thing is to tickle your complexes and your own vanity).
As we already know, not only the early feudal states but also later communities are attempts by some of the «brothers» to prove that they are far from the brotherhood, have cooled down from kinship feelings; therefore, they are fed up with envy and jealousy of their fellow tribesmen, that they are now not brothers, but they are an aristocracy now and a privileged stratum. There is only one remedy against this – to rise above the clan, above the people (all the leaders, even the modern Elbasy, still do this; this is not trivia for us, the zeref’s reflection has been ruling for 5000 years). Suppose strategic diplomacy appears in the form of dynastic marriages. In that case, this is already the handwriting of the aristocracy (in any form of manifestation, if we want to create a planetary elite today – A.B.) It’s better to let equal envy and be jealous of your equal, although it’s not so vile.
Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.
Текст предоставлен ООО «Литрес».
Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на Литрес.
Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.