Конца света не будет. Почему экологический алармизм причиняет нам вред. Майкл Шелленбергер
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу Конца света не будет. Почему экологический алармизм причиняет нам вред - Майкл Шелленбергер страница 54
Название: Конца света не будет. Почему экологический алармизм причиняет нам вред
Автор: Майкл Шелленбергер
Издательство: Издательство АСТ
Серия: Будущее сегодня
isbn: 978-5-17-139017-4, 978-0063-00169-5
isbn:
170
J. A. J. Gowlett, “Discovery of Fire by Humans: A Long and Convoluted Process,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 371, no. 1696 (June 2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0164.
171
Michael Williams, Deforesting the Earth: From Prehistory to Global Crisis, an Abridgment, 146.
172
Keith Thomas, Man and the Natural World: Changing Attitudes in England, 1500–1800 (Oxford University Press, 1983), 192. Animals in England, writes a historian, “had been divided into the wild, to be tamed or eliminated, the domestic, to be exploited for useful purposes, and the pet, to be cherished for emotional satisfaction.”
173
Michael Shellenberger, “An Interview with Founder of Earth Innovation, Dan Nepstad,” Environmental Progress, August 25, 2019, http://environmentalprogress.org/big-news/2019/8/29/an-interview-with-founder-of-earth-innovation-dan-nepstad.
174
“Brazil and the Amazon Forest,” Greenpeace, accessed January 20, 2020, https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/issues/brazil-and-the-amazon-forest. Michael Shellenberger, “An Interview with Founder of Earth Innovation, Dan Nepstad,” Environmental Progress, August 25, 2019, http://environmentalprogress.org/big-news/2019/8/29/an-interview-with-founder-of-earth-innovation-dan-nepstad.
175
Michael Shellenberger, “An Interview with Founder of Earth Innovation, Dan Nepstad.”
176
Michael Shellenberger, “An Interview with Founder of Earth Innovation, Dan Nepstad.”
177
John Briscoe, “Infrastructure First? Water Policy, Wealth, and Well-Being,” Belfer Center, January 28, 2012, https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/infrastructure-first-water-policy-wealth-and-well-being.
178
John Briscoe, “Invited Opinion Interview: Two Decades at the Center for World Water Policy,” Water Policy 13, no. 2 (February 2011): 151, https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2010.000.
179
John Briscoe, “Infrastructure First? Water Policy, Wealth, and Well-Being.”
180
Rhett Butler, “Greenpeace Accuses McDonald’s of Destroying the Amazon,” Mongabay, April 7, 2006, https://news.mongabay.com.
181
Michael Shellenberger, “An Interview with Founder of Earth Innovation, Dan Nepstad.”
182
Michael Shellenberger, “An Interview with Founder of Earth Innovation, Dan Nepstad.”
183
Michael Shellenberger, “An Interview with Founder of Earth Innovation, Dan Nepstad.”
184
Michael Shellenberger, “An Interview with Founder of Earth Innovation, Dan Nepstad.”
185
Michael Shellenberger, “An Interview with Founder of Earth Innovation, Dan Nepstad.”
186
Michael Shellenberger, “An Interview with Founder of Earth Innovation, Dan Nepstad.”
187
David P. Edwards et al., “Wildlife-Friendly Oil Palm Plantations Fail to Protect Biodiversity Effectively,” Conservation Letters 3 (2010): 236–42, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00107.x.
188
Michael Shellenberger, “An Interview with Founder of Earth Innovation, Dan Nepstad.”
189
Dave Keating, “Macron’s Mercosur Veto – Are Amazon Fires Being Used as a Smokescreen for Protectionism?” Forbes, August 23, 2019, https://www.forbes.com.
190
Dave Keating, “Macron’s Mercosur Veto – Are Amazon Fires Being Used as a Smokescreen for Protectionism?” Forbes, August 23, 2019, https://www.forbes.com.
191
Dave Keating, “Macron’s Mercosur Veto – Are Amazon Fires Being Used as a Smokescreen for Protectionism?” Forbes, August 23, 2019, https://www.forbes.com.
192
“Jair Bolsonaro to Merkel: Reforest Germany, Not Amazon,” Deutsche Welle, August 15, 2019, https://www.dw.com/en/jair-bolsonaro-to-merkel-reforest-germany-not-amazon/a-50032213.
193
“Brazil’s Lula Blasts Rich Nations on Climate,” Reuters, February 6, 2007, https://www.reuters.com.
194
“The analyses show that in agriculturally consolidated areas (mainly southern and southeastern Brazil), land-use intensification (both on cropland and pastures) coincided with either contraction of both cropland and pasture areas, or cropland expansion at the expense of pastures, both cases resulting in farmland stability or contraction. In contrast, in agricultural frontier areas (i.e., the deforestation zones in central and northern Brazil), land-use intensification coincided with expansion of agricultural lands. These observations provide support for the thesis that (i) technological improvements create incentives for expansion in agricultural frontier areas; and (ii) farmers are likely to reduce their managed acreage only if land becomes a scarce resource. The spatially explicit examination of land-use transitions since 1960 reveals an expansion and gradual movement of the agricultural frontier toward the interior (center-western Cerrado) of Brazil.” Barretto et al., “Agricultural Intensification in Brazil and Its Effects on Land-Use Patterns: An Analysis of the 1975–2006 Period.”
195
Bernardo B. N. Strassburg, Agnieszka E. Lataweic, Luis G. Barioni et al., “When Enough Should Be Enough: Improving the Use of Current Agricultural Lands Could Meet Production Demands and Spare Natural Habitats in Brazil,” Global Environmental Change 28 (September 2014): 84–97, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.001.