Название: Continental Rifted Margins 1
Автор: Gwenn Peron-Pinvidic
Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited
Жанр: Физика
isbn: 9781119986911
isbn:
Salt has commonly been associated with geophysical imaging problems. Firstly, salt bodies may be non-reflective or have complex internal structures depending on the original layering and mode of deformation. Secondly, salt structures such as diapirs, typical of many rifted margins worldwide, usually have steep sub-vertical geometries that are often poorly imaged and that often also generate geophysical noise, making their exact shape and edge-diapir location difficult to define. Thirdly, the contrast between shallow high-velocity salt and low-velocity sediment causes migration problems and artifacts. Finally, there are many cases where little orno energy penetrates salt sheets/canopies into subsalt domains and then back to the surface receivers. However, new acquisition and processing techniques now allow much better imaging (Figure 1.34).
Further reading.– The above descriptions are abbreviated and often simplified. If interested in reading and learning further, the reader is referred to the following list of publications and references:
– General: (Vendeville and Jackson 1992; Jackson and Vendeville 1994; Withjack and Callaway 2000; Jammes et al. 2010; Rowan 2014, 2020; Warren 2016; Jackson et al. 2020).
Figure 1.33. Styles and features of rift-related salt tectonics: a) thick-skinned extension; b) gravity-driven, linked thin-skinned extension, translation and contraction. Not to scale, and a) and b) are at different scales
Figure 1.34. Improvement of seismic imaging, especially in the subsalt domain (example from the southern Gulf of Mexico) (source: Shann et al. (2020))
1.5.3. Magma
Magmatism contributes to rift evolution and final margin architecture to various degrees, and depends on various parameters, such as extension rate and different characteristics of the lithosphere and asthenosphere (White and McKenzie 1989; White 1992). A series of typical volcanic geometries often observed, interpreted and/or modeled in rifted margins are summarized below and exemplified in Figure 1.35. These are traditionally distinguished into three main types: intrusives, extrusives and underplates.
Intrusive magmatic features refer to magmatic rocks emplaced in rocks that were previously in place. Depending on the emplacement geometry relative to the previous rocks, these intrusions can be concordant or discordant. Sills are tabular intrusions, emplaced between older layers, in a concordant intrusive sheet, while dikes are defined as discordant intrusive sheets that will crosscut older rocks. Sills are commonly fed by dikes. Additional intrusive magmatic bodies include the following: pluton, which refers to large intrusive bodies; batholiths, which are intrusive complexes of several magmatic bodies of large dimension (typically several plutons) and laccoliths, which are concordant plutons and form when the magmatic rocks are intruded between rock layers with high pressure, forcing an upward doming/folding of the overlying strata and giving rise to an overall mushroom-like form with a generally planar base.
Extrusive magmatic features are magmatic rocks emplaced above the Earth’s surface, at the seafloor or at the surface. In rifted margins, these include a long series of possible features such as lava flows, lava deltas and volcanoes. Secondary geometries can also be generated, such as mass wasting events and volcanic-derived sediments. Their seismic reflection facies are often very well defined with typically high-amplitude reflectors; however, the conditions leading to their emplacement are still very much debated.
Underplates refer to rocks that are emplaced as uniform bodies at the base of pre-existing rocks – usually below the lower crust in extended rifted margin settings. Field outcrops and deep-sea drilling observation prove the existence of underplated magmatic bodies. In modern rifted margins, however, these structures cannot be directly observed. Their presence has been proposed based on the interpretation of geophysical models, making them indirect observations. HVLC and LCB are widely used acronyms that refer to these particular bodies. HVLC is an abbreviation for “high velocity lower crust” and “LCB” for “lower crustal body” (see Chapter 2 for further explanation and discussion around these terms).
Given the wide range of geometries and contexts of emplacement, the study of magmatic features in rifts and rifted margins is a specialized research topic: seismic volcanostratigraphy, a concept inherited from Mitchum et al. (1977) and Symonds et al. (1998). Seismic volcanostratigraphy uses seismostratigraphy and sequence stratigraphy concepts to identify and map magmatic sequences, based on their seismic facies. The study of seismic reflection geometries associated with volcanic successions is used to constrain the emplacement context, depositional environment and potential subsequent remobilization and transport. For many decades, these geometries remained unclear and unconstrained due to seismic imaging issues. However, the recent advances in seismic processing have greatly improved imaging and resolution. Some deep-sea drilling campaigns that are specifically dedicated to the sampling of the volcanic successions of the NE Atlantic rift have been able to place crucial constraints on their lithologies and ages (DSDP Leg 38, 104 and 152, 163; Eldholm et al. 1987; Saunders et al. 1998; Larsen et al. 1999). These modern advances allow for highly detailed studies of the temporal and spatial evolution of the magmatic activity of the rifted margin, notably in terms of paleogeography and morphology at breakup time.
We briefly list below the major magmatic geometries often encountered in distal rifted margin settings (Figure 1.35). We will follow the classification built on the West Indian margin case (Calvès et al. 2011) and descriptions of the Voring mid-Norwegian margin (Abdelmalak et al. 2016). Both are based on the early descriptions made by Symonds et al. (1998) and Planke et al. (2000):
– SDRs (seaward dipping reflectors): these are a specific feature identified on seismic reflection profiles by a wedge-shape/fan-like geometry, opening and dipping oceanward with medium- to high-amplitude seismic reflectors (Mutter et al. 1982). The top continentward termination has been drilled (e.g. in the NE Atlantic; Eldholm et al. 1989) and the related strong reflectors have been proven to correspond to subaerially-erupted flood basalts. Thus, when identified in distal rifted margin settings, SDR-like seismic geometries are often interpreted as fully basaltic structures. However, no constraints exist on their internal lithologies, notably the ratio between sediments and magma. Based on their position, the packages are often distinguished into inner SDRs and outer SDRs, depending on whether they are located landward or oceanward from the outer high, respectively:
- СКАЧАТЬ