Название: Advanced Analytics and Deep Learning Models
Автор: Группа авторов
Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited
Жанр: Программы
isbn: 9781119792413
isbn:
3.6.2 Sparsity Problem
This is also a very important problem that all recommender systems are facing nowadays. It happens when user has large history list. The list contains everything like list of items he bought or list of movies he watched or listed of music he listened and even his previous surfing list. Sparsity happens when the user does not give rating after buying items or after watching movies. Rating is the most fundamental element for a MCRS. Because of lack of rating, a recommender system does not able to understand that whether the client liked that particular thing or not [34].
3.6.3 Scalability
Scalability is related to the multi-criteria recommender systems own performance. Generally, recommender system does not consume many resources. It is designed such a way that it gives best accuracy by using minimum resource. Recommender system needs to recommend a list of items to the user. But with time, the number of users increases, the number of items also increases, and the recommendation list is also increasing [34].
3.6.4 Over Specialization Problem
When a MCRS is able to know about the choices of a particular client, then it creates a boundary and shows according to their choice without discovering new items and other options with time. This situation is known as over specialization problem [34].
3.6.5 Diversity
If a user spends a long time in a platform, then the recommender system has a lot of information about him. If he orders almost same kind of things, then the recommender system generates the recommendation list that is based on the same category only [34].
3.6.6 Serendipity
Every recommender system should have an objective that to surprise people by recommending new product and make interest in the user [34].
3.6.7 Privacy
For recommender system privacy is very important. As the recommender system knows some information about the user, it should not be going to the outside world. The users need to understand which data is required to approve more ideally items to them and how it used [34].
3.6.8 Shilling Attacks
It happens when a user became malicious or unethical. Many times, it is observed that user starts giving false rating in some items. If it happens, then either the rating of that good item will drop down and that item will no longer recommended or a bad quality item will get more good ratings and will be recommended more by MCRS. This is known as shilling attack [34].
3.6.9 Gray Sheep
Gray sheep takes place normally in CF systems. Here, the belief of a client does not identify with any group and consequently. It is no able to acquire the advantage of recommendations [34].
3.7 Conclusion
In this chapter of MCRS, we understood the definition of a recommender system, its growing importance, and applications in various sectors. Further, we discussed about the different phases of a recommender system. Moreover, we deeply analyzed the three different filtering techniques associated with the recommender system that includes collaborative, content-based, and knowledge-based filtering techniques. In addition, we also discussed about the hybrid filtering techniques. To have a better understanding on the concept of the recommender system, we considered five research activities conducted by various researchers across the globe. Lastly, we also discussed about the various advantages and the challenges prevailing in the recommender system.
Nowadays, recommender systems are widely used in various aspects, with the passage of time, the recommender systems are being modified and are showing better performance. New techniques are implemented in the recommender system to derive a better prediction [1].
References
1. Al-Ghuribi, S.M. and Noah, S.A.M., Multi-criteria review-based recommender system–the state of the art. IEEE Access, 7, 169446–169468, 2019.
2. Wasid, M. and Ali, R., An improved recommender system based on multi-criteria clustering approach. Proc. Comput. Sci., 131, 99–101, Jan. 2018.
3. Zheng, Y., Utility-based multi-criteria recommender systems, in: Proc. 34th ACM/SIGAPP Symp. Appl. Comput., pp. 2529–2531, 2019.
4. Tallapally, D., Sreepada, R.S., Patra, B.K., Babu, K.S., User preference learning in multi-criteria recommendations using stacked auto encoders. Presented at the Proc. 12th ACM Conf. Recommender Syst., Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2018.
5. Musto, C., de Gemmis, M., Semeraro, G., Lops, P., A multi-criteria recommender system exploiting aspect-based sentiment analysis of users’ reviews. Presented at the Proc. 11th ACM Conf. Recommender Syst., Como, Italy, 2017.
6. García-Cumbreras, M. Á., Montejo-Râez, A., Díaz-Galiano, M.C., Pessimists and optimists: Improving collaborative filtering through sentiment analysis. Expert Syst. Appl., 40, 17, 6758–6765, 2013.
7. Zhang, W., Ding, G., Chen, L., Li, C., & Zhang, C. (2013). Generating virtual ratings from chinese reviews to augment online recommendations. ACM Transactions on intelligent systems and technology (TIST), 4(1), 1–17.
8. Bauman, K., Liu, B., Tuzhilin, A., Aspect based recommendations: Recommending items with the most valuable aspects based on user reviews, in: Proc. 23rd ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowl. Discovery Data Mining, pp. 717–725, 2017.
9. Akhtar, N., Zubair, N., Kumar, A., Ahmad, T., Aspect based sentiment oriented summarization of hotel reviews. Proc. Comput. Sci., 115, 563–571, Jan. 2017.
10. Yang, C., Yu, X., Liu, Y., Nie, Y., Wang, Y., Collaborative filtering with weighted opinion aspects. Neurocomputing, 210, 185–196, Oct. 2016.
11. Dong, R., O’Mahony, M.P., Schaal, M., McCarthy, K., Smyth, B., Sentimental product recommendation, in: Proc. 7th ACM Conf. Recommender Syst, pp. 411–414, 2013.
12. Wang, F., Pan, W., Chen, L., Recommendation for new users with partial preferences by integrating product reviews with static specications, in: Proc. Int. Conf. Modeling, Adaptation, Pers., pp. 281–288, 2013.
13. Musat, C.C., Liang, Y., Faltings, B., Recommendation using textual opinions, in: Proc. Int. Joint Conf. Artif. Intell., pp. 2684–2690, 2013.
14. Jamroonsilp, S. and Prompoon, N., Analyzing software reviews for software quality-based ranking, in: Proc.10th Int. Conf. Elect. Eng./Electron., Comput., Telecommun. Inf. Technol. (ECTI-CON), May 2013, pp. 1–6.
15. Zhang, Y., Liu, R., Li, A., A novel approach to recommender system based on aspect-level sentiment analysis, in: Proc. 4th Nat. Conf. Electr., Electron. Comput. Eng. (NCEECE), pp. 1453–1458, СКАЧАТЬ