Spatial Analysis. Kanti V. Mardia
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Spatial Analysis - Kanti V. Mardia страница 13

Название: Spatial Analysis

Автор: Kanti V. Mardia

Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited

Жанр: Математика

Серия:

isbn: 9781118763575

isbn:

СКАЧАТЬ to maximum likelihood.

      The book has had a long gestation period. When we started writing the book the 1980s, the literature was much sparser. As the writing of the book progressed, the subject has evolved at an increasing rate, and more sections and chapters have been added. As a result the coverage of the subject feels more complete. At last, this first edition is finished (though the subject continues to advance).

      A series of workshops at Leeds University (the Leeds Annual Statistics Research [LASR] workshops), starting from 1979, helped to develop the cross‐disciplinary fertilization of ideas between Statistics and other disciplines. Some leading researchers who presented their work at these meetings include Julian Besag, Fred Bookstein, David Cox, Xavier Guyon, John Haslett, Chris Jennison, Hans Künsch, Alain Marechal, Richard Martin, Brian Ripley, and Tata Subba‐Rao.

      We are extremely grateful to Wiley for their patience and help during the writing of the book, especially Helen Ramsey, Sharon Clutton, Rob Calver, Richard Davies, Kathryn Sharples, Liz Wingett, Kelvin Matthews, Alison Oliver, Viktoria Hartl‐Vida, Ashley Alliano, Kimberly Monroe‐Hill, and Paul Sayer. Secretarial help at Leeds during the initial development was given by Margaret Richardson, Christine Rutherford, and Catherine Dobson.

      We have had helpful discussions with many participants at the LASR workshops and with colleagues and students about the material in the book. These include Robert Adler, Francisco Alonso, Jose Angulo, Robert Aykroyd, Andrew Baczkowski, Noel Cressie, Sourish Das, Pierre Delfiner, Peter Diggle, Peter Dowd, Ian Dryden, Alan Gelfand, Christine Gill, Chris Glasbey, Arnaldo Goitía, Colin Goodall, Peter Green, Ulf Grenander, Luigi Ippoliti, Anil Jain, Giovanna Jona Lasinio, André Journel, Freddie Kalaitzis, David Kendall, Danie Krige, Neil Lawrence, Toby Lewis, John Little, Roger Marshall, Georges Matheron, Lutz Mattner, Charles Meyer, Michael Miller, Mohsen Mohammadzadeh, Debashis Mondal, Richard Morris, Ali Mosammam, Nitis Mukhopadhyay, Keith Ord, E Pardo‐Igúzquiza, Anna Persson, Sophia Rabe, Ed Redfern, Allen Royale, Sujit Sahu, Paul Sampson, Bernard Silverman, Nozer Singpurwalla, Paul Switzer, Charles Taylor, D. Vere‐Jones, Alan Watkins, Geof Watson, Chris Wikle, Alan Wilson, and Jim Zidek.

      John is grateful to his wife Sue for her support in the writing of this book, especially with the challenges of the Covid pandemic. Kanti would like to thank the Leverhulme Trust for an Emeritus Fellowship and Anna Grundy of the Trust for simplifying the administration process. Finally, he would like to express his sincere gratitude to his wife and his family for continuous love, support and compassion during his research writings such as this monograph.

      We would be pleased to hear about any typographical or other errors in the text.

      30 June 2021

       John T. Kent

       Kanti V. Mardia

        and denote the real numbers and integers.

       For a dimension , a site is a location or . The elements or components of a site are written using square bracketsNote is not in bold face.

       A random field is synonymous with a stochastic process. A random field on is written as , using function notation. A random field on the lattice is written as , using subscript notation. A random field is often assumed to be a Gaussian process (GP).

       The mean function and covariance function are written as and covariance function . In the stationary case, is constant and depends only on the lag . In the lattice case, use subscripts, e.g. .

       A stationary covariance function can be written as a product of a marginal variance σ2 and an autocorrelation function ρ(h).

       An intrinsic random field extends the idea of a stationary random field. Write for an intrinsic random field of order (IRF‐) with intrinsic covariance function . For an intrinsic random field of order 0 (IRF‐0), the semivariogram is given by . A registered version of an intrinsic random field is denoted .

       For a stationary model, a scheme is a parameterized family of covariance functions. For an intrinsic model, a scheme is a parameterized family of intrinsic covariance functions (or equivalently for an IRF‐0 model, a parameterized family of semivariograms).

       A nugget effect refers to observations from a random field subject to measurement error, with variance typically denoted .

       The vector of covariance parameters for a stationary or intrinsic model, possibly including a nugget effect, is denoted and can be partitioned as in terms of an overall scale parameter and the remaining parameters.

       Spaces of polynomials in (Section 3.4):– : Space of homogeneous polynomials of degree , with dimension denoted – : Space of all polynomials of degree in , with dimension denoted .

        denotes the isotropic self‐similar intrinsic random field of index and with drift space (Section 3.10). The intrinsic covariance function is denoted and spectral density is denoted .

       Most of the book is concerned with ordinary random fields. There are also generalized random fields indexed by functions rather than sites and written as with covariance functional .

       The surface area of the unit sphere in is denoted .

        denotes a domain of sites in or . The notation encompasses several possibilities, including the following:– An open subset , e.g. – A finite collection of sites in or – The infinite lattice – A finite rectangular lattice in ,with dimension vector and of size . In the lattice case, sites in can be denoted using letters such as to emphasize the link to the continuous case, or using letters such as to emphasize the fact that the components are integers.For a finite domain, the notation stands for the number of sites in .

       Frequencies in the Fourier domain are denoted .

       Vectors indexing data are treated as column vectors and are written as in bold lowercase letters, with the components indicated by subscripts. The transpose of is denoted . This subscript convention is typical in multivariate analysis. Note the difference from the convention for sites and frequencies .

       Random vectors, e.g., or are written in bold letters, with the components indicated by subscripts. In particular, upper case is used when the distinction between a random quantity and its possible values needs emphasis.

       Matrices are written using nonbold uppercase letters, e.g. and , with the elements of written as or as . The two notations are synonymous. The columns of are written using bracketed subscripts, . For a square matrix, the determinant is denoted by either or ; the notation should not be confused with , the size of a domain described above.

       If and are sites, then is the inner product and is the squared Euclidean norm.

       Modulo notation (for numbers) and (for vectors) (Section A.1)

       Check and convolution notation. If is a function of , let . Thenand the latter is symmetric in .

       The Kronecker delta and Dirac delta functions are denoted and , respectively.

       . A finite symmetric neighborhood of the origin in . The augmented neighborhood includes the origin. Half of the neighborhood is denoted (Section 4.4).

       . СКАЧАТЬ