Introduction to UAV Systems. Mohammad H. Sadraey
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Introduction to UAV Systems - Mohammad H. Sadraey страница 23

Название: Introduction to UAV Systems

Автор: Mohammad H. Sadraey

Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited

Жанр: Техническая литература

Серия:

isbn: 9781119802624

isbn:

СКАЧАТЬ UAV attempted an air‐to‐air engagement with an Iraqi MiG‐25 in 2002?

      90 When was the Predator UAV retired?

      91 Briefly compare the primary differences between the Predator and the Reaper.

      92 Compare the main difference between configurations of the Predator and the Reaper.

      93 When was the first operational mission of the MQ‐9 Reaper?

      94 What are the payloads of the MQ‐9 Reaper?

      95 Briefly describe the characteristics of GCS of the MQ‐9 Reaper.

      96 What is the type of propulsion system for the MQ‐9 Reaper?

      97 Write: (a) maximum takeoff mass, (b) wingspan, and (c) engine Power of the MQ‐9 Reaper.

      98 Write: (a) maximum speed, (b) range, (c) endurance, and (d) ceiling of the MQ‐9 Reaper.

      99 List the dominant US UAV manufacturers.

      100 Briefly discuss the ethical concerns of UAVs.

      101 What is the mission of the Swift HALE UAV?

      102 Name three recent UAV projects with a pseudo‐satellite mission.

      Note

      1 1 https://www.modelaircraft.org

      2.1 Overview

      Much of the early development of UAS was driven by government and military requirements, and the bureaucracies that manage such programs have made repeated efforts to establish a standard terminology for describing various types of UAS in terms of the capabilities of the air vehicles. While the “standard” terminology constantly evolves and occasionally changes abruptly, some of it has come into general use in the UAV community and is briefly described.

      Finally, the chapter also attempts to summarize the applications for which UAS have been or are being considered, which provides a context for the system requirements that drive the design tradeoffs that are the primary topic of this book.

      2.2.1 Classification Criteria

No. Classification Criterion Class
1 Manufacturing location 1. Home‐made (Model), 2. Industrial
2 User 1. Civil, 2. Military
3 Mission 1. Filming, 2. Package delivery, 3. Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR), 4. Precision strike, 5. Combat (UCAV), 6. Teaming, 7. Meteorological measurements, 8. High‐altitude platform, 9. Search and observation
4 Size 1. Micro, 2. Mini, 3. Very small, 4. Small, 5. Medium, 6. Large
5 Wing configuration 1. Fixed‐wing, 2. Rotary‐wing (includes multi‐copter), 3. Hybrid
6 FAA [5] Small UAVs (under FAR Parts 48 and 107)
7 Altitude/Range/Endurance 1. Very low‐cost close range, 2. Close range, 3. Short range, 4. Mid‐range, 5. Long range, 6. Medium‐altitude, long endurance (MALE), 7. High‐altitude, long endurance (HALE)
8 Number of uses 1. Reusable, 2. Expendable

      In the following sections, three specific classifications based on: (1) range and endurance, (2) mission, and (3) tier (for US Air Force, Marine Corps, and Army) are presented.

      2.2.2 Classification by Range and Endurance

      Shortly after being appointed the central manager of US military UAV programs, the Joint UAV Program Office (JPO) defined classes of UAVs as a step toward providing some measure of standardization to UAV terminology. They were:

       Very Low‐Cost, Close‐Range: Required by the Marine Corps and perhaps the Army to have a range of about 5 km (3 miles) and cost about $10,000 per air vehicle. This UAV system fits into what could be called the “model airplane” type of system and its feasibility with regard to both performance and cost had not been proven but since has been demonstrated by systems such as the Raven and Dragon Eye.

       Close Range: Required by all of the services but its concept of operation varied greatly depending on the service. The Air Force usage would be in the role of airfield damage assessment and would operate over its own airfields. The Army and Marine Corps would use it to look over the next hill, and desired a system that was easy to move and operate on the battlefield. The Navy wanted it to operate from small ships such as frigates. It was to have a range of 50 km (31 miles), with 30 km (19 miles) forward of the FLOT. The required endurance was from 1 to 6 h depending on the mission. All services agreed СКАЧАТЬ