Risks and the Anthropocene. Julien Rebotier
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу Risks and the Anthropocene - Julien Rebotier страница 13
Название: Risks and the Anthropocene
Автор: Julien Rebotier
Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited
Жанр: География
isbn: 9781119902751
isbn:
Latour, B. (2015). Face à Gaïa. La Découverte, Paris.
Latour, B. (2017). Où atterrir ? Comment s’orienter en politique. La Découverte, Paris.
Lavell, A. and Maskrey, A. (2014). The future of disaster risk management. Environmental Hazards, 13(4), 267–280.
Lewis, S. and Maslin, M.A. (2015). Defining the Anthropocene. Nature, 519(7542), 171–180.
Lorimer, J. (2017). The Anthroposcene: A guide for the perplexed. Social Studies of Science, 47(1), 117–142.
Lövbrand, E., Beck, S., Chilvers, J., Forsyth, T., Hedrén, J., Hulme, M., Lidskog, R., Vasileiadou, E. (2015). Who speaks for the future of Earth? How critical social science can extend the conversation on the Anthropocene. Global Environmental Change, 32, 211–218.
Lovelock, J. and Margulis, L. (1974). Atmospheric homeostasis by and for the biosphere: The Gaia hypothesis. Tellus, 26(1–2), 2–10.
Malm, A. and Hornborg, A. (2014). The geology of mankind? A critique of the Anthropocene narrative. The Anthropocene Review, 1(1), 62–69.
Marsh, G.P. (1865). Man and Nature; or Physical Geography as Modified by Human Action. C. Scribner, New York.
Maskrey, A. (ed.). (1993). Los desastres no son naturales. La Red, Panama [Online]. Available at: www.desenredando.org/public/libros/1993/ldnsn/LosDesastresNoSonNaturales-1.0.0.pdf [Accessed 8 May 2020].
Mathieu, N. and Jollivet, M. (1989). Du rural à l’environnement. Penser les changements socio-écologiques. L’Harmattan, Paris.
Mercer, J. (2012). Knowledge and disaster risk reduction. In The Routledge Handbook of Hazards and Disaster Risk Reduction, Wisner, B., Gaillard, J-C., Kelman, I. (eds). Routledge, New York.
Metzger, P. (2017). Connaissances et relations de pouvoir : les sciences sociales, les risques et l’environnement. HDR Thesis, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble.
Metzger, P. and Robert, J. (2015). Environnement et risques : les sciences sociales piégées entre critique radicale et utilité sociale. In Espaces et rapports de domination, Clerval, A., Fleury, A., Rebotier, J., Weber, S. (eds). PUR, Rennes.
Moore, J. (2003). Capitalism as world-ecology. Braudel and Marx on environmental history. Organization and Environment, 16(4), 431–458.
Moore, J. (2017a). The Capitalocene part I: On the nature and origins of our ecological crisis. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 44(3), 594–630.
Moore, J. (2017b). Confronting the popular Anthropocene. Toward an ecology of hope. New Geographies, 9, 186–191.
Moore, J. (2017c). The road to ruin? Making sense of the Anthropocene. IPPR Progressive Review, 24(3), 176–202.
Moore, J. (2018). The Capitalocene part II: Accumulation by appropriation and the centrality of unpaid work/energy. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 45(2), 237–279.
Mumford, L. (1950). Technique et civilisation. Le Seuil, Paris.
O’Brien, K., Eriksen, S., Nygaard, L.P., Schjolden, A. (2007). Why different interpretations of vulnerability matter in climate change discourses. Climate Policy, 7(1), 73–88.
O’Keefe, P., Westgate, K., Wisner, B. (1976). Taking the naturalness out of natural disasters. Nature, 260(5552), 566–567.
Oliver-Smith, A., Alcántara-Ayala, I., Burton, I., Lavell, A. (2017). The social construction of disaster risks: Seeking root causes. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 22, 469–474.
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 354–365.
Palsson, G., Szerszynski, B., Sörlin, S., Marks, J., Avril, B., Crumley, C., Hackmann, H., Holm, P., Ingram, J., Kirman, A., Pardo Buendía, M., Weehuizen, R. (2013). Reconceptualizing the “Anthropos” in the Anthropocene: Integrating the social sciences and humanities in global environmental change research. Environmental Science and Policy, 28, 3–13.
Passeron, J.-C. (1995). L’espace mental de l’enquête (I). Enquête, 1, 13–42.
Peet, R. and Watts, M. (1996). Liberation Ecologies. Environment, Development and Social Movements. Routledge, London.
Pelletier, P. (1993). L’imposture écologiste. Reclus, Montpellier.
Pelling, M. (2010). Adaptation to Climate Change: From Resilience to Transformation. Routledge, London.
Pigeon, P. and Rebotier, J. (2016). Disaster Prevention Policies. A Challenging and Critical Outlook. ISTE Press, London, and Elsevier, Oxford.
Rebotier, J. (2020). Adaptation. In Dictionnaire critique de l’anthropocène, Cynorhodon (ed.). CNRS Édition, Paris.
Rebotier, J., Pigeon, P., Metzger, P. (2019). Returning social context to seismic risk knowledge & management. Lessons learned from an interdisciplinary research in the city of Esmeraldas, Ecuador. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography [Online]. Available at: https://journals.openedition.org/cybergeo/31787 [Accessed 11 May 2020].
Ribot, J. (2014). Cause and response: Vulnerability and climate in the Anthropocene. Journal of Peasant Studies, 41(5), 667–705.
Ribot, J. (2019). Social causality of our common climate crisis: Toward a sociodicy for the Anthropocene. In The Commons in a Glocal World: Global Connections and Local Responses, Haller, T., Breu, T., De Moor, T., Rohr, C., Znoj, H. (eds). Routledge, London.
Robbins, P. (2004). Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction. Blackwell Publishing, Hoboken, NJ.
Robic, M.-C. (ed.) (1992). Du milieu à l’environnement : pratiques et représentations du rapport homme-nature depuis la Renaissance. Economica, Paris.
Robic, M.-C. (ed.) (2006). Couvrir le monde. Un grand XXe siècle de géographie française. ADFP, Paris.
Rodríguez, H., Quarantelli, E.L., Dynes, R.R. (2007). Handbook of Disaster Research. Springer, New York.
Rossi, G. (2001). L’ingérence écologique. CNRS Éditions, Paris. Servigne, P. and Stevens, R. (2015). Comment tout peut s’effondrer. Le Seuil, Paris.
Shaw, СКАЧАТЬ