Handbook of Intelligent Computing and Optimization for Sustainable Development. Группа авторов
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу Handbook of Intelligent Computing and Optimization for Sustainable Development - Группа авторов страница 57
Название: Handbook of Intelligent Computing and Optimization for Sustainable Development
Автор: Группа авторов
Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited
Жанр: Техническая литература
isbn: 9781119792628
isbn:
This case study uses NNs for compression of the channel information at UE and recovery of the same at the BS. The CSI matrix compression for feedback is similar to the unsupervised clustering problem [51]. It uses an autoencoder structure, as shown in Figure 5.5, where the encoder present at the UE converts the CSI matrix into a K-dimensional vector. This is the reduced representation of the original matrix. This K-dimensional vector is then transmitted as feedback to the BS, where the decoder converts the received vector back into its original form.
Figure 5.5 Autoencoder model for CSI feedback.
5.3.2.1 Proposed Network Model
This case study proposes a novel network named inception network (InceptNet), which uses inception blocks as shown in Figure 5.6 and also used in GoogleLeNet [23]. The inception block consists of multiple parallel convolution blocks of different filter sizes. An extra 1 × 1 convolution before the 3 × 3 and 5 × 5 convolutions help in dimensionality reduction. These different filter sizes help in extracting both the generic features spread across the image and the local features. The encoder and decoder blocks of the proposed network are shown in Figure 5.7, which follows the autoencoder model presented in Figure 5.5.
Figure 5.6 Inception block.
Figure 5.7 Encoder and decoder blocks of InceptNet.
The input to the encoder is the channel matrix, and the output is a vector of reduced dimension K. The encoder consists of a single inception block. This output vector is fed back to the decoder where the decoder network with two parallel inception blocks recovers the channel matrix. The compression from N-dimensions of channel matrix to K-dimensional vector is given in terms of compression ratio (CR), where CR = K/N.
5.3.2.2 Results and Discussion
The training and testing of the models are set up in Keras built on top of TensorFlow using Google Colaboratory. COST 2100 channel model is used to generate the data set. The data set provided by Wen et al. [20] is used for simulation here. The training data consists of 100,000 samples. The validation and test set contain 30,000 and 20,000 samples, respectively. All the test samples are independent of the training and validation samples. The network is trained for 100 epochs with a batch size of 200. The learning rate is set to 0.001. Adam optimizer is used to update the parameters, and the mean squared error (MSE) function is used as the loss function. The NMSE quantitatively provides the difference between the original channel matrix
(5.1)
The CSI feedback serves as a beamforming vector. Consider hrn as the reconstructed channel vector of the nth sub-carrier and
(5.2)
where Nc is the number of sub-carriers.
Figure 5.8 shows the pseudo gray plots of the channel matrices. The recovered channel images for both CsiNet and InceptNet with CR = 1/4.
Figure 5.8 Pseudo gray plots of (a) original image (b) image recovered by CsiNet for CR= 1/4 (c) image recovered by InceptNet for CR= 1/4.
Table 5.2 shows the comparative analysis between the already existing CsiNet and the proposed InceptNet. For low compression ratio of 1/4, the NMSE for InceptNet is −18.68 dB and for CsiNet −14.43 dB. The InceptNet gives a better recovery of the channel matrix as compared to the CsiNet. Even for a high compression ratio of 1/32, it is observed that NMSE is “−7.987” dB for InceptNet and “−5.32” for CsiNet. It is observed that the InceptNet outperforms the CsiNet in both NMSE and cosine similarity for all compression ratios. The InceptNet achieves better performance by training for only 100 epochs. The parallel inception blocks with different filter sizes help in better extraction of both high level and subtle features. The training time and quantitative results can be further improved by using the recently developed network architectures.
Table 5.2 Performance comparison analysis for 100 epochs between CsiNet and InceptNet.
| CR | CsiNet | InceptNet | ||
| NMSE (dB) | Cosine Similarity | NMSE (dB) | Cosine Similarity | |
| 1/4 | −14.43 | 0.979 | −18.68 | 0.989 |
| 1/8 | −11.35 | 0.963 | −13.014 | 0.973 |
| 1/16 | −8.08 | 0.932 | −9.357 | 0.941 |
| 1/32 | −5.32 | 0.874 | −7.987 | 0.918 |