Reservoir Characterization. Группа авторов

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ modulus:

      (2.2)

      The usual process is initiated by replacing the primary fluid with a fluid with similar sets of velocities and rock densities, compared with the primary fluid. These velocities are usually obtained from logs, but sometimes they may also be the results of theoretical models. In this study, the velocity of the wave that has passed through the primary fluid (in our case, supercritical dioxide is injected into the water) is obtained through laboratory measurements. But the removal of the existing fluid effects and replacing it by the common fluid (brine) has been achieved through the following steps (Dvorkin, 2003):

      In the first stage the effective bulk modulus of pore fluid composition, () is calculated using:

      (2.3)

where, Sgas, Soil, Sbr, indicate gas, oil and brine saturation and Kgas, Koil, Kbr, correspond to the apparent modulus of gas, oil, and brine. In the next step, bulk modulus of rock (K_log), is calculated by equation (2.4):

(2.4)

where, ρb is the bulk density and Vp is the compressional wave velocity of the rock. At the next step, bulk modulus of dry rock (K_dry) is calculated using the equation (2.5) and the mineral bulk modulus:

(2.5)

      where, ϕ is porosity and Kmineral is the apparent modulus in the mineral phase (Thomsen, 1986). The bulk modulus of rock saturated with brine (Kcommon) is determined by:

      (2.6)

      where, Kcf is the bulk modulus. The compressional wave modulus of the rock saturated with brine (Mcommon) is calculated using the following formula:

      (2.7)

      The compressional wave velocity after removal of the primary fluid and replacing it with brine is obtained by:

      (2.8)

      In this case, when the shear wave data is not available, compressional wave modulus (M_log) is calculated from charts (logs) using the following relation:

      (2.9)

      The compressional wave modulus of the dry rock (Mdry) is also calculated using compressional wave modulus of the rock’s minerals:

      (2.10)

      (2.11)

      where, ϕ is porosity, μmineral is shear modulus and Kmineral is the apparent modulus in the mineral phase. The changes in the elastic modules of different minerals as a whole have been estimated [28]. Finally, the compressional wave modulus of the brine saturated rock (Mcommon) is calculated as follows:

      (2.12)

      Greenberg - Castagna formula is defined for rocks completely saturated with brine. In this paper, the apparent modulus (Kcf) of 2/25 is assumed for brine saturated cases.

      It is worth mentioning that the fluid changes have no effect on shear wave modulus, which is the same before and after complete saturation with brine.

      2.2.2 Estimating Geomechanical Parameters

      Here to determine the bulk modulus, shear modulus, and Young’s modulus of rocks, we assumed that they are elastic, homogeneous and isotropic and used the following formula:

      (2.13)

      (2.14)

      (2.15)

2.3 Laboratory Set Up and Measurements

The data used in this study were collected by a core flooding system at the laboratory of petroleum engineering department, Curtin University of Technology, Australia. The tested sandstone sample has the volume of 2.350 (gr/cm³), 3.79 cm in diameter, 7.98 cm in length and the porosity of 36/43 deg. After drying and preliminary preparation of this sample, it was placed in a polymer sleeve to be protected from the fluid axial pressure applied. The sample was placed inside the core holder, and piezoelectric (transducers) were placed on the caps to send and receive the acoustic wave. Figure 2.2 shows schematically, how the sample and exposure transducer were placed.

As seen in Figure 2.2, the enclosed sample is under P_r pressure (radial pressure) and axial pressure, P_ax, is applied. In these conditions, the pore pressure is shown as Pp. In Figure 2.2, OD represents the outside diameter of the cap, ID represents the inside diameter of the cap, r is the core radius and P_axial is effective axial pressure that is calculated as in equation (2.16):

(2.16)

Figure 2.2 The placement of the test device is shown in schemati.

Different parts of this chamber which is in direct contact with the fluid, are neutral to chemical reaction. At the ends of this chamber, two caps are placed were the transducers have been installed. As seen СКАЧАТЬ