Название: Harlan's Crops and Man
Автор: H. Thomas Stalker
Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited
Жанр: Биология
isbn: 9780891186366
isbn:
It is not surprising, therefore, to find independent domestications of different species of the same genus, and if the genus is widespread, the different domesticates may have originated in different continents. Examples of such vicarious domestications occur in the following genera, among others:
1 Mesoamerica and South America—Amaranthus, Annona, Canavalia, Capsicum, Carica, Chenopodium, Cucurbita, Gossypium, Opuntia, Pachyrrhizus, Phaseolus, and Physalis;
2 Africa and Asia—Amorphophallus, Cucumis, Digitaria, Dioscorea, Dolichos, Hibiscus, Oryza, Piper, Solanum, and Vigna;
3 Old and New Worlds—Amaranthus, Canavalia, Dioscorea, Gossypium, Ipomoea, Lepidium, Lupinus, Panicum, Prunus, Setaria, Solanum, and Spondias.
Understanding Life Cycles of Plants
What do nonagricultural people know of the life cycles of plants? Do they know that flowers lead to seeds and that seeds can be sown to produce more plants? Is this something that must be learned or discovered to commence the domestication of plants or is this a part of the general botanical knowledge of gathering peoples?
A look at the ethnographic evidence shows that some gatherers do plant seeds. Seven of 19 groups studied by Steward (1941) in Nevada sowed seeds of wild plants (Downs, 1964). No tillage was practiced; the seedbed was generally prepared by simply burning the vegetation the previous fall and seeding in the spring. The seeds sown were of entirely wild plants; the most frequently mentioned were species of Chenopodium, Oryzopsis, Mentzelia, and Sophia (Steward, 1941).
The Paiute tribe of Owens Valley, California, practiced irrigation and also broadcast seeds to thicken up stands of desired plants, but none was domesticated. Irrigation was designed to increase production of wild plants such as Nicotiana attenuata Torr. ex S. Watson, Salvia columbariae Benth., Chenopodium fremontii S. Watson, Chenopodium album L., Helianthus bolanderi A. Gray, Eriocoma hymenoidsis (Roem. & Shult.) Rydb. and Eleocharis spp. The earthen dams were simple, but the rather extensive canals required considerable labor to build. One block covered about 5 km2 and another close to 13 km2 (Steward, 1934). As previously pointed out, however, Natives of the Great Basin could have been influenced by neighboring agriculturalists and their botanical knowledge may not be typical of gatherers in preagricultural times. Let us look elsewhere.
To the Andamanese, the goddess Puluga symbolizes the southwest monsoon that brings violent winds and rains from April to October (Coon, 1971):
Puluga owned all the wild yams and cicada grubs that the people ate, and all the beeswax that they used in hafting, calking, and cordage. Women who dug yams had to replace the tops to fool Puluga…
Indeed, if Puluga caught the people misusing her property she would get angry and send bad weather. Here we see the practice of planting reinforced by a religious belief. The practice is useful to the people, but does not of itself prove understanding.
An early observation of Sir George Grey (1841) concerning Australian Aborigines is more revealing:
The natives have, however, a law that no plant bearing seeds is to be dug up after it has flowered; they then call them (for example) the mother of Bohn, the mother of Mud‐ja (Haemadorum spp.), etc.; and so strict are they in their observance of this rule that I have never seen a native violate it, unless requested by an European, and even then they betray a great dislike to do so.
The practice is confirmed by Gregory (1886):
The natives on the West Coast of Australia are in the habit among other things of digging up yams as a portion of their means of subsistence; the yams are called “ajuca” in the north and “wirang” in the south. In digging up these yams they invariably re‐insert the head of the yams so as to be sure of a future crop, but beyond this they do absolutely nothing which may be regarded as a tentative step in the direction of cultivating plants for their use.
There seems to be little doubt that the life cycles of plants were well understood by native Australians. The Aborigines were equipped with all the knowledge necessary to practice agriculture, but did not do so.
Klimek (1935) recorded 11 tribes of California peoples that grew a local species of tobacco, but no other crop. Some tribes in Oregon, Washington, and British Columbia followed the same practice (Drucker, 1963). The tobacco was usually either N. attenuata or N. quadrivalvis Pursh. Harrington (1932) made a very detailed study of tobacco among the Karuk, and found the extent of botanical knowledge remarkable. The Karuk burned logs in the forest and sowed seeds in the ashes. A tobacco garden was called “to plant” or more literally “to put seed.” The Karuk had terms for cultivated tobacco, wild tobacco, roots, stems, bark, leaves, branches, leaf branches, pith, gum, flowers, buds, seedpods, flower stem, clusters of flowers, sepals, and calyx. No standard word was used for petal, but descriptive terms were used, for example, the white‐flowered N. quadrivalvis was said to have “five white ones sticking out.” The stamens and pistil were described as “sticking out in the middle of every flower where the seeds are going to be.” Stamens are “flower whiskers,” “flower threads,” or “flower hairs.” Pollen is “flower dust.” Nine stages of flowering to seed setting were recognized with descriptive terms. There was a classification of seeds, grains, seeds in the midst of a fruit (pit), seeds inside a shell (nut), and so on.
The translation of an informant's description of germinating tobacco seed is botanically accurate and detailed (Harrington, 1932, p. 61):
Its seeds fall to the ground. The dirt gets over them. Then, after a while, when it gets rained on, the seed sprouts. Sometimes all the seeds do not grow up. They say sometimes some of the seeds get rotten. Its sprouts are small white ones, pretty near the size of a hair. Whenever it is just peeping out, its seed is on top of it. Then they just have two leaves, when they first peep out of the ground. They grow quickly when they grow; in a little while they are tall ones.
The Karuk fertilized with ashes, sowed, weeded, harvested, selected for strength, cured, stored, and sold tobacco, but grew no other crop. Clearly, the concept of planting seeds was in no way revolutionary and did not lead to food production (Harrington, 1932). Where did people ever get the idea that hunter‐gatherers did not know about life cycles of plants? The egocentricity of agriculturalists is extraordinary. The situation is summed up succinctly by Flannery (1968): “We know of no human group on earth so primitive that they are ignorant of the connection between plants and the seeds from which they grow… .”
General Botanical Knowledge
We should not be surprised if gathering peoples know a lot about plants. They are the real “professional botanists”; for them, life depends on an adequate knowledge of plants. We have seen that gatherers are familiar with hundreds of species and their uses for food. We have noted that many are poisonous and must be detoxified before they can be eaten.
Since “ignorance” is part of the stereotype developed by agricultural people about gatherers, I would like to call attention to an episode described with some apparent pleasure by Sir George Grey (1841). Some of the crew of Captain Cook's expedition of the 1770s observed the Aborigines eating seeds of Zamia (a cycad). The crew tried some of their own harvest of Zamia and became very ill. They concluded that the Aborigines must have very strong constitutions to be able to live on such food. Later, on shipboard, they fed Zamia seeds to some pigs, and a few died. Their admiration for the physical stamina of the natives increased substantially. The Aborigines, of course, had removed the poison before eating their seeds, and were, no doubt, amused at the “ignorance” of their European visitors.
Detoxification СКАЧАТЬ