Administrative Review A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Administrative Review A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk страница 7

СКАЧАТЬ review?

      <--- Score

      55. Is the Administrative review scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      56. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      57. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      58. How does the Administrative review manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      59. Are the Administrative review requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      60. What are the State administrative review requirements for school food authorities and organizations?

      <--- Score

      61. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      62. What Administrative review services do you require?

      <--- Score

      63. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      64. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      65. What Administrative review requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      66. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      67. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      68. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      69. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      70. What system do you use for gathering Administrative review information?

      <--- Score

      71. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      72. What is the role and requirements of administrative review (hearing) officials?

      <--- Score

      73. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      74. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Administrative review work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      75. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      76. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      77. Who are the Administrative review improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      78. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      79. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      80. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      81. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?

      <--- Score

      82. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      83. Is there a clear Administrative review case definition?

      <--- Score

      84. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      85. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Administrative review leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      86. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      87. Has the Administrative review work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      88. Do you all define Administrative review in the same way?

      <--- Score

      89. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      90. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      91. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      92. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      93. Are the Administrative review requirements complete?

      <--- Score

      94. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      95. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      96. Is there any additional Administrative review definition of success?

      <--- Score

      97. How do you think the partners involved in Administrative review would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      98. What information should you gather?

СКАЧАТЬ