Название: Administrative Review A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition
Автор: Gerardus Blokdyk
Издательство: Ingram
Жанр: Зарубежная деловая литература
isbn: 9781867461043
isbn:
3.0 Executing Process Group: Administrative Review213
3.1 Team Member Status Report: Administrative Review215
3.2 Change Request: Administrative Review217
3.3 Change Log: Administrative Review219
3.4 Decision Log: Administrative Review221
3.5 Quality Audit: Administrative Review223
3.6 Team Directory: Administrative Review226
3.7 Team Operating Agreement: Administrative Review228
3.8 Team Performance Assessment: Administrative Review230
3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: Administrative Review232
3.10 Issue Log: Administrative Review234
4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Administrative Review236
4.1 Project Performance Report: Administrative Review238
4.2 Variance Analysis: Administrative Review240
4.3 Earned Value Status: Administrative Review242
4.4 Risk Audit: Administrative Review244
4.5 Contractor Status Report: Administrative Review246
4.6 Formal Acceptance: Administrative Review248
5.0 Closing Process Group: Administrative Review250
5.1 Procurement Audit: Administrative Review252
5.2 Contract Close-Out: Administrative Review254
5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: Administrative Review256
5.4 Lessons Learned: Administrative Review258
Index260
CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Where is training needed?
<--- Score
2. When a Administrative review manager recognizes a problem, what options are available?
<--- Score
3. Would you recognize a threat from the inside?
<--- Score
4. What are the clients issues and concerns?
<--- Score
5. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?
<--- Score
6. Are employees recognized or rewarded for performance that demonstrates the highest levels of integrity?
<--- Score
7. What vendors make products that address the Administrative review needs?
<--- Score
8. To what extent does each concerned units management team recognize Administrative review as an effective investment?
<--- Score
9. Where do you need to exercise leadership?
<--- Score
10. Are you dealing with any of the same issues today as yesterday? What can you do about this?
<--- Score
11. Who needs to know?
<--- Score
12. Which issues are too important to ignore?
<--- Score
13. What is the Administrative review problem definition? What do you need to resolve?
<--- Score
14. Did you miss any major Administrative review issues?
<--- Score
15. What would happen if Administrative review weren’t done?
<--- Score
16. What information do users need?
<--- Score
17. What creative shifts do you need to take?
<--- Score
18. Is the need for organizational change recognized?
<--- Score
19. What training and capacity building actions are needed to implement proposed reforms?
<--- Score
20. How do you take a forward-looking perspective in identifying Administrative review research related to market response and models?
<--- Score
21. Will it solve real problems?
<--- Score
22. Can management personnel recognize the monetary benefit of Administrative review?
<--- Score
23. How do you assess your Administrative review workforce capability and capacity needs, including skills, competencies, and staffing levels?
<--- Score
24. Does Administrative review create potential expectations in other areas that need to be recognized and considered?
<--- Score
25. Are your goals realistic? Do you need to redefine your problem? Perhaps the problem has changed or maybe you have reached your goal and need to set a new one?
<--- Score
26. How many trainings, in total, are needed?
<--- Score
27. What activities does the governance board need to consider?
СКАЧАТЬ