The Shadow of Solomon: The Lost Secret of the Freemasons Revealed. Laurence Gardner

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ of supreme authority over the masons in France), Augustus was afforded another position in 1819, when selected to head the French Supreme Council in Britain.²⁷ This greatly appealed to him because, in contrast to Dunkerley’s pseudo-Grand Conclave, it was a Templar-style institution with its roots in the exiled Stuart Rite, and would grant him the high-degree patent in Britain.

      By virtue of his family ruining his first marriage, Augustus was rather more inclined towards Stuart than Hanoverian sympathy, and so he accepted the nomination. The trouble was that he could not tell his masonic colleagues in England about the plan, and therefore had his masonic secretary make the arrangements. This man was Joseph Hippolyte da Costa, the Portuguese mason who had been extricated by his English friends from papal custody, and who wrote about the Dionysian Artificers (see page 34). In the event, the office proved to be a title without a function because there was nothing the Duke could do to further his appointment without making his French collaboration known.

      From this somewhat egotistical masonic era of Grand Councils and Supreme Conclaves, comes an intriguing and very ordinary sounding name, listed among all the aristocrats and royalty. It appears in the 1845 Statutes of the Temple by authority of the Grand Conclave in Scotland which states that in 1808 a certain ‘Mr Alexander Deuchar was elected Commander of the Edinburgh Templars’. These are the Statutes of a pseudo-Templar Conclave in Scotland that had a serious effect on the relationship between English and Irish Freemasons before and after the amalgamation of the Ancients and Moderns.

      Alexander Deuchar was a seal-engraver who became aware of the possibility of a French Templar Council being instituted in Britain long before the offer to head such a body was made to Duke Augustus. The background negotiations had begun when the French Council was itself formed in 1804. Major Müller of the 1st Royal Foot had the ear of the Duke’s brother, Prince Edward, Duke of Kent, and Deuchar conspired with Müller to approach Edward for a Charter of Dispensation to establish an anti-Jacobite Templar authority in Scotland.

      Deuchar’s brother, David, was an officer in the Peninsula War (Britain against France in Portugal, 1808-14) and, during the campaign at Leira in Portugal, he stole the altar cross from a Templar chapel in the Castle of Tomar in order to aid his brother’s endeavour. In the old days, the Deuchars had served Scotland well and, from the time of Bannockburn (24 June 1314) and beyond, the Great Sword of Deuchar, with its family coat-of-arms, was a welcome sight on any battlefield. By 1745, however, the table had turned, and the Deuchar allegiance swayed, so that Lyon of East Ogil (a Jacobite supporter of Charles Edward Stuart) made it his business to carry off the prized heirloom. The sword was, nevertheless, retrieved after Culloden, to be held by the Hanoverian supporter Alexander Deuchar when he began his discussions with the Duke of Kent.

      Seeing his opportunity to get a firm Hanoverian foothold in Scotland, the Duke agreed to Deuchar’s request, and the new establishment became known as the Scottish Conclave, with Deuchar as its Grand Master. However, the Duke of Kent asserted that the English Masonic rules must be followed, and that he would himself be the Royal Grand Patron of the Conclave established ‘in that part of Great Britain called Scotland’. Not surprisingly, within a few decades influential Whigs were allowed to buy their way into the Conclave. The Duke of Leeds, for example (who had no Templar training) was admitted in 1848, to become Steward of the Great Priory within just a few months, and the Episcopal Bishop of Edinburgh was similarly admitted.²⁸

      The Scottish Grand Conclave was formally constituted in 1811, and falling under Deuchar’s banner of intended Scottish subjugation were several traditional Templar lodges of the legitimate Irish Grand Encampment whose warrants were from Ireland. In 1826, the Grand Master of these lodges in Scotland was Robert Martin, who wanted nothing whatever to do with the Deuchar interlopers or the Duke of Kent. The Conclave was formally denounced by the Dublin Encampment on 28 December 1827. All Encampment Templars who had succumbed to the unethically created Hanoverian protectorate in Scotland were instructed to surrender their original Irish warrants to Robert Martin. In condemning the establishment of the Deuchar Conclave, the Irish document stated, ‘Every ancient Sir Knight knows that the Duke of Kent had no more authority to do so than Deuchar himself.’²⁹

      This completes an overview of the first 100 years of the new-style English Freemasonry as it evolved during the Georgian era. There is little mention in the records of those symbolic or charitable ideas that were seemingly in the minds of the original tavern-club members of the early 1700s. Apart from internal wrangling and disputes between different factions, the century was mainly concerned with the establishment of power bases and grand titles. There are references, here and there, of an evolving lodge ritual, which was added to at various stages—the first mention of the Temple pillars Jachin and Boaz, for example, occurring in 1762.³⁰ Not until the 1800s did anything that might be recognized by today’s masons begin to take shape. The basic ceremonial format was settled in around 1816, while the philosophical and moral concepts were very much a product of the latter Victorian era. Despite the fact that the newly initiated Entered Apprentice Freemason believes himself to be in a privileged realm of ancient mysteries, there is actually not that much in modern ritual that can claim to be especially ancient, except in theory. This is not a criticism of current masonic practice, it is simply a recognition that the historical provenance of certain aspects is not always correct in the way it is conveyed.

       6 Imperial Conquest

      The Celtic Realms

      Although there was a Grand Master for Wales by the middle 1700s, there was no formally constituted Grand Lodge as such. In Ireland and Scotland, however, Grand Lodges were established as separate institutions to the Grand Lodge of England, and they remain independent today. The Grand Lodge of Ireland was founded in 1725, and the Grand Lodge of Antient, Free and Accepted Masons of Scotland in 1736.

      Documentary evidence of Freemasonry in Ireland dates back to the 1600s, and the present headquarters is in Dublin. The journal Dublin Weekly of 26 June 1725 relates that two days earlier Richard, Earl of Rosse, was installed as Grand Master of Ireland, and the story of privately-run Irish lodges immediately prior to this is worth noting.¹

      Unlike in the English system, women were not necessarily precluded from becoming masons in Ireland. A well-documented lady Freemason of the era was the Hon Elizabeth St Leger (b. 1693), sister of the 4th Viscount of Doneraile, County Cork.² Initiated in about 1715, Elizabeth’s later portrait depicts her in a masonic attitude and wearing her apron.³ Following the Earl of Rosse, the Irish Grand Master from 1731 was James, Lord Kingston. His father had been a Jacobite exile with King James and, on returning to Ireland in 1693, he was charged with recruiting for the Stuart cause. The same happened with Grand Master James in 1722.

      The first extant reference to Freemasonry in Ireland comes from a student graduation speech delivered at Trinity College, Dublin, in 1688. It was stated that a new college was to be established with a society of Freemasons.⁴ The penal laws William of Orange (Billy Windmills to his Irish subjects) drew up against the people of Ireland, Protestants and Catholics alike, were extremely harsh, particularly his ruinous 1699 prohibition of Irish wool exports to England. Many have wondered why the Protestants of Ireland were shamefully treated by the monarch they had served so well at the Battle of the Boyne—especially when his wife, Queen Mary, was a convinced Protestant—but the answer is straightforward. The trade sanction was imposed in 1699, but Mary had died in 1694, leaving William as the sole ruler. His interests were not with Britain or Ireland, and they were certainly not with the Protestants. His mission throughout was to maximize Holland’s trading position against that of France. In Scotland, where the masonic tradition dates back to much earlier times, King William was equally ruthless, even though Scotland was a Protestant nation with a National Kirk. In fact, the Scots had been subjected to a blanket excommunication СКАЧАТЬ