Enzyme-Based Organic Synthesis. Cheanyeh Cheng

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ Based on Anstas and Warner [31]; Hill et al. [32].

Prevention: It is better to prevent waste than to treat or clean up waste after it has been created.Atom Economy: Synthetic methods should be designed to maximize the incorporation of all materials used in the process into the final product.Less Hazardous Chemical Syntheses: Wherever practicable, synthetic methods should be designed to use and generate substances that possess little or no toxicity to human health and the environment.Designing Safer Chemicals: Chemical products should be designed to affect their desired function while minimizing their toxicity.Safer Solvents and Auxiliaries: The use of auxiliary substances (e.g. solvents, separation agents) should be made unnecessary wherever possible and innocuous when used.Design for Energy Efficiency: Energy requirements of chemical processes should be recognized for their environmental and economic impacts and should be minimized. If possible, synthetic methods should be conducted at ambient temperature and pressure.Use of Renewable Feedstocks: A raw material or feedstock should be renewable rather than depleting whenever technically and economically practicable.Reduce Derivatives: Unnecessary derivatization (use of blocking groups, protection/deprotection, and temporary modification of physical/chemical processes) should be minimized or avoided, if possible, because such steps require additional reagents and can generate waste.Catalysis: Catalytic reagents (as selective as possible) are superior to stoichiometric reagents.Design for Degradation: Chemical products should be designed so that at the end of their function they break down into innocuous degradation products and do not persist in the environment.Real‐time Analysis for Pollution Prevention: Analytical methodologies need to be further developed to allow for real‐time, in‐process monitoring, and control prior to the formation of hazardous substances.Inherently Safer Chemistry for Accident Prevention: Substances and the form of a substance used in a chemical process should be chosen to minimize the potential for chemical accidents, including releases, explosions, and fires.

Probably, the greatest disadvantage of free‐enzyme catalyzed reaction for green chemistry is only one time usage of the expensive purified enzyme due to the difficulty of enzyme recovery. To overcome this drawback, the enzyme‐catalyzed reaction can be performed by using whole microbial cell. However, the use of whole cell catalyzed reaction can be considered convenient against the free enzyme reaction under three situations: (i) as the enzyme is intracellular; (ii) as the enzyme needs a cofactor to carry out the catalysis; and (iii) the formation of product through a multienzymatic processes. The other strategy is to perform the enzyme reaction with immobilized enzyme that can be recovered and reused many times. However, the maintenance of activity for the recovered enzyme is a big challenge in present technology. Nevertheless, this is probably the fundamental approach for enzyme‐catalyzed reaction to fulfill green chemistry.

      To encourage and propel the implementation of green chemistry, the Presidential Green Chemistry Challenge Award was established by the United States government in 1996. The following are several award winners that can be used as models in green chemistry by using enzyme and related microbe for production of chemicals [35].

      The winner of year 2011: Production of Basic Chemicals from Renewable Feedstocks at Lower Cost

      Genomatica has developed a microbe using sophisticated genetic engineering to make 1,4‐butanediol (BDO) (a high‐volume chemical building block used to make many common polymers, such as spandex) by fermenting sugars. When produced at commercial scale, Genomatica’s Bio‐BDO will be less expensive, require about 60% less energy, and produce 70% less carbon dioxide emissions than BDO made from natural gas.

      1.7 The Winner of Year 2010: Greener Manufacturing of Sitagliptin Enabled by an Evolved Transaminase

      Merck and Codexis have developed a second‐generation green synthesis of sitagliptin, the active ingredient in Januvia, a treatment for type 2 diabetes. This collaboration has led to an enzymatic process with transaminase that reduces waste, improves yield and safety, and eliminates the need for a metal catalyst. Early research suggests that the new biocatalysts will be useful in manufacturing other drugs as well.

1.8 The Winner of Year 2009: A Solvent‐Free Biocatalytic Process for Cosmetic and Personal Care Ingredients

      Esters are an important class of ingredients in cosmetics and personal care products. Usually, they are manufactured by harsh chemical methods that use strong acids and potentially hazardous solvents; these methods also require a great deal of energy. Eastman’s new method uses immobilized enzymes to make esters, saving energy, and avoiding both strong acids and organic solvents. This method is so gentle that Eastman can use delicate, natural raw materials to make esters never before available.

References

      1 1 Segal, I.H. (1975). Enzyme Kinetics. Behavior and Analysis of Rapid Equilibrium and Steady‐State Enzyme Systems. New York: Wiley.

      2 2 Armstrong, F.B. (1989). Biochemistry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

      3 3 Silverman, R.B. (2002). The Organic Chemistry of Enzyme‐Catalyzed Reactions. Amsterdam: Academic Press.

      4 4 Sumner, J.B. (1926). J. Biol. Chem. 69: 435–441.

      5 5 Sumner, J.B.J. (1926). Boil. Chem. 70: 97–98.

      6 6 Jabri, E., Carr, M.B., Hausinger, R.P., and Karplus, P.A. (1995). Science 268: 998–1004.

      7 7 Jabri, E. and Karplus, P.A. (1996). Biochemistry 35: 10616–10626.

      8 8 Hirs, C.H.W., Moore, S., and Stein, W.H. (1960). J. Biol. Chem. 235: 633–647.

      9 9 Nelson, D.L. and Cox, M.M. (2000). Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry. New York: Worth Publishers.

      10 10 Lubert, S. (1988). Biochemistry, Thirde. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

      11 11 Mathews, C.K., van Holde, K.E., and Ahern, K.G. (2000). Biochemistry, Thirde. San Francisco: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

      12 12 Zubay, G. (1988). Biochemistry, Seconde. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

      13 13 Faber, K. (2004). Biotransformations in Organic Chemistry, A Textbook, Fifthe. Berlin: Springer‐Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

      14 14 Sweers, H.M. and Wong, C.‐H. (1986). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 108: 6421–6422.

      15 15 Bashir, N.B., Phythian, S.J., Reason, A.J., and Roberts, S.M.J. (1995). Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1: Org. Bio‐org. Chem 18: 2203–2222.

      16 16 Dadd, M.R., Claridge, T.D.W., Walton, R. et al. (2001). Enz. Microbial Technol. 29: 20–27.

      17 17 Takenaka, S., Mulyono, Sasano, Y. et al. (2006). J. Biosci. Bioeng. 102: 21–27.

      18 18 Bustillo, A.J., García‐Pajón, C.M., Aleu, J. et al. (2003). Tetrahedron.: Asymmetry 14: 3755–3760.

      19 19 Shimoda, K., Harada, T., Hamada, H. et al. (2007). Phtochem. 68: 487–492.

      20 20 Dai, J., Ye, M., Guo, H. et al. (2002). Tetrahedron 58: 5659–5668.

      21 21 Miyazawa, M., Sugie, A., and Shindo, M. (2002). Biosci. Biotechnol. Ciochem. 66: 2458–2460.

      22 22 Miyazawa, M., Marumoto, S., Masuda, A. et al. (2009). J. Agric. Food Chem. 57: 7800–7804.

      23 23 Sih, C.J. and Wu, S.‐H. (1989). Topics Stereochem. 19: 63–125.

      24 24 СКАЧАТЬ