Название: Corrosion Policy Decision Making
Автор: Группа авторов
Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited
Жанр: Техническая литература
isbn: 9781119764335
isbn:
Dry abrasion blasting with silica sand, copper slag, steel grits, etc. is the most correct and common method of field and workshop surface preparation. In a scientific research, the author investigated the surface preparation factors affecting the primer adhesion to steel substrate; the primer was an epoxy zinc phosphate with a dry thickness of 60 μm. The surface was prepared by different methods. The results are according to Table 2.1. Primer adhesion on all samples was acceptable, however, there was a noticeable difference between the adhesions of the primer to the steel surface prepared by different methods. Between some common methods of surface preparation, abrasive blasting especially by sand, to the degree of cleanness of Sa3, shows the highest quality on the paint adhesion.
Figure 2.15 Examples of unqualified workers.
Figure 2.16 Some weakness of the surface preparation. Paint application on rusted surface (left). Unsuitable abrasives and reuse of them several times (right). Weak surface preparation on weld lines (down).
Table 2.1 Adhesion of a common zinc phosphate epoxy primer on the steel surfaces prepared with several methods.
Preparation methods | Adhesion (MPa)ASTM D4541 | Disbanding condition |
---|---|---|
Washing with white sprite | 1.73 | Paint layer from metal surface |
Wire brush ST3 | 3.19 | Paint layer from metal surface |
Weak acid washing | 2.89 | Paint layer from metal surface |
Hard acid washing | 4.48 | Paint layer from metal surface |
Phosphating | 4.30 | Paint layer from metal surface |
Wet sand blast, water blast | 8 | Paint layer from metal surface |
Dry sand blast Sa3 | 11.63 | Paint layer from metal surface |
In other research, the effect of different types of abrasives on steel preparation was investigated. Physical and chemical properties of tested abrasives are discussed in [17–19].
Properties of some abrasives are determined according to Table 2.2. In a series of tests, the author examined and compared the adhesion of a zinc phosphate epoxy primer with the same thickness on steel sheets that were prepared with these different abrasives. Results are summarized in Table 2.3.
Often, the functional performance of abrasives, such as the effect on primer adhesion is very important. It affects the mechanical stability of the film, as well as its chemical resistance, especially when the film is exposed to humid and saline environments during service time. The author investigated the effect of a number of abrasives on cured film performance by doing several tests. For that, some samples were blasted by different abrasives. They were coated with the same paint, having nearly dry film thickness. Then they were tested in a humidity chamber according to ASTM D2247, and in a salt spray chamber according to ASTM B117 [20, 21].
In these experiments, silica sand compared with different abrasives used for blasting surface. A noteworthy point about carbon steel samples prepared with copper slags was that their particles trapped in all samples. Slag particles were observed which could not washed out even by using air pressure (five bar pressure) and washing with solvent. However, for samples prepared with silica sand, leaving excess particles from the surface with compressed air were easily and completely removed from the surface. All samples were coated with the same paint layer with a similar dry film thickness.
Table 2.2 Properties of tested abrasives in blasting.
Test | Standard | Result for all samples |
---|---|---|
Hardness (mohz) | SSPC‐AB‐1 | At least 6 |
Weight change on ignition | SSPC‐AB‐1 | Max. 5% |
Oil content | ASTM D‐7393 | No visible |
Specific gravity | ASTM C‐128 | Min. 2.5 |
Moisture content | ASTM C‐566 | 0.5%< |
Water soluble contaminants | ASTM D‐4940 | <1000 μs/cm |
Table 2.3 Effect of abrasives on adhesion of primer at humid and salty environments.
Abrasives | Adhesion test before exposureASTM D4541Psia | Adhesion test; 1500 hours salt spray and 24 hours dryingASTM D4541 Psia | Adhesion test; 1500 hours humidity and24 hours dryingASTM D4541Psia |
---|---|---|---|
Copper slag Sample A | 1687 | 528 | 1603 |
Copper slag Sample B | 1541 | 486 | Test error |
Copper slag Sample C | 1569 | 388 | 1160 |
Copper slag Sample D |
1446
СКАЧАТЬ
|