Corrosion Policy Decision Making. Группа авторов
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Corrosion Policy Decision Making - Группа авторов страница 20

СКАЧАТЬ phases of a paint operation is the surface preparation, which sometimes costs quite a bit. Appropriate weather conditions, good blasting materials, equipment, and proper technical skills are needed to prepare the surface. Most of the paint problems of industrial equipment are due to the weakness of the surface preparation. Some examples of these problems are observed during the field operation inspections seen in Figure 2.16. In scientific documents, special attention is referred to this issue [11].

Photo depicts examples of unqualified workers. Photo depicts some weakness of the surface preparation. Paint application on rusted surface (left). Unsuitable abrasives and reuse of them several times (right). Weak surface preparation on weld lines (down).
Preparation methods Adhesion (MPa)ASTM D4541 Disbanding condition
Washing with white sprite 1.73 Paint layer from metal surface
Wire brush ST3 3.19 Paint layer from metal surface
Weak acid washing 2.89 Paint layer from metal surface
Hard acid washing 4.48 Paint layer from metal surface
Phosphating 4.30 Paint layer from metal surface
Wet sand blast, water blast 8 Paint layer from metal surface
Dry sand blast Sa3 11.63 Paint layer from metal surface

      In other research, the effect of different types of abrasives on steel preparation was investigated. Physical and chemical properties of tested abrasives are discussed in [17–19].

      Often, the functional performance of abrasives, such as the effect on primer adhesion is very important. It affects the mechanical stability of the film, as well as its chemical resistance, especially when the film is exposed to humid and saline environments during service time. The author investigated the effect of a number of abrasives on cured film performance by doing several tests. For that, some samples were blasted by different abrasives. They were coated with the same paint, having nearly dry film thickness. Then they were tested in a humidity chamber according to ASTM D2247, and in a salt spray chamber according to ASTM B117 [20, 21].

      In these experiments, silica sand compared with different abrasives used for blasting surface. A noteworthy point about carbon steel samples prepared with copper slags was that their particles trapped in all samples. Slag particles were observed which could not washed out even by using air pressure (five bar pressure) and washing with solvent. However, for samples prepared with silica sand, leaving excess particles from the surface with compressed air were easily and completely removed from the surface. All samples were coated with the same paint layer with a similar dry film thickness.

Test Standard Result for all samples
Hardness (mohz) SSPC‐AB‐1 At least 6
Weight change on ignition SSPC‐AB‐1 Max. 5%
Oil content ASTM D‐7393 No visible
Specific gravity ASTM C‐128 Min. 2.5
Moisture content ASTM C‐566 0.5%<
Water soluble contaminants ASTM D‐4940 <1000 μs/cm
Abrasives Adhesion test before exposureASTM D4541Psia Adhesion test; 1500 hours salt spray and 24 hours dryingASTM D4541 Psia Adhesion test; 1500 hours humidity and24 hours dryingASTM D4541Psia
Copper slag Sample A 1687 528 1603
Copper slag Sample B 1541 486 Test error
Copper slag Sample C 1569 388 1160
Copper slag Sample D 1446 СКАЧАТЬ