How the Neonomads will save the world. Alter-globalism edition. Daniyar Z Baidaralin
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу How the Neonomads will save the world. Alter-globalism edition - Daniyar Z Baidaralin страница 12
Название: How the Neonomads will save the world. Alter-globalism edition
Автор: Daniyar Z Baidaralin
Издательство: Издательские решения
Жанр: Документальная литература
isbn: 9785449872968
isbn:
The EN realized the dangers of this process. Many conquerors preferred to keep their nomadic lifestyle, continuing to roam around in their mobile yurt cities around the captured cities. Sometimes the entire nomadic states or even empires got split because the most traditional part of the nomads didn’t want to be in the same nation with the Sarts. For instance, this is how the two modern Central Asian nations got formed: the Kazakhs and the Uzbeks. They used to be in one semi-nomadic state, called the State of the Nomadic Uzbeks. But then they split into two separate states: the one that preferred to mix with the Sarts and settle became the modern day Uzbeks, and the one that preferred to stay nomadic became the today’s Kazakhs.
The Sarts of Eurasia always viewed the EN as an uncontrollable, wild, alien, strange, deadly, and often even as a punishing force of nature. On the opposite side, the nomads considered their Great Steppe to be locked into a ring of Sartic nations (Sartic Civilization Ring, SC Ring) that threatened to choke them and take away their precious free lifestyle.
Sometimes the Sartic world produced own conquerors, and they invaded the Great Steppe, subjugating the nomads into their SC empires. The Persian Achaemenids and Alexander the Great both invaded the nomadic realm and caused major disruption, some Chinese dynasties made successful advancements deep into nomadic territories; the non-nomadic Central Asian empires often stroke at nomads, and turned them into their vassals.
Therefore, both the Nomadic and Sartic civilizations had love and hate relationships for thousands of years, while also mutually enriching and feeding each other via the inevitable cultural and technological exchange.
Sartism vs Nomadism
As I described in previous chapter, the nomadic society was complex, vibrant, and well-established. It had a conceptual framework, integral system, social fabric, economic basis, political construct, culture, communication, and conscious self-awareness. It represented the alternative model of civilization.
Unfortunately, the Eurasian Nomads were universally considered «barbarian», wild beasty peoples without rule of law and human rights. The SC collective genetic memory holds an image of endless hordes of stocky horse riders with Mongoloid faces, wearing animal furs, shooting rains of arrows, wielding curved sabers, screaming madly and destroying anything they see.
It is hard to blame the SC nations, because for millennia this is exactly what they saw every time they encountered the EN. They never knew about the delicate, intricate inner life of the nomadic society, because it was hidden from the SC eyes in the vast plains of Eurasia. And by the time the Sartic explorers have finally had a chance to visit the Great Steppe in Modern Age and see the nomadic life, it was already too late: the wrong image was already cast in concrete, and the nomadic society was collapsing, allowing only a glimpse at its prior greatness.
Even in the Sartic academic circles of Modern Era there is still an incorrect point of view of the Eurasian Nomads. There is no official recognition of the Eurasian Nomadic Civilization. The EN still remain proverbial «bad guys of history» who never got a chance to be called «a civilization».
This negative perception happened only because the EN didn’t meet some of the definitions of «civilized» in the Europe-centric, China-centric, or Islam-centric SC (I will call it Sartic-Centrism). But in reality the EN had all the features of a full-bodied civilization, simply in a different configuration, as shown in a table below.
As we can see from the table, the EN world had the same features as the Sartic civilizations of the past. The main difference is that the Sartic Civilization always preferred to rely on complex systems and institutions at the expense of individual freedoms, while the ENC relied more on personalities and individuals, their reason and common sense, and had simplified systems and institutions.
The main qualities of a Sartic person, to this day, are his successes, wealth, social status, possessions, estates, and etc. For an EN person the main qualities were his or her honor, honesty, skills, personal aptitudes, and humanness. The last one is kind of hard to imagine in a tough Steppe warrior, but in reality this is probably the main quality in a nomadic person from the nomadic perspective. The Kazakh word of humanness is adamgershilik, and it is still valued most of all.
For three millennia this form of civilization gave the Eurasian Nomads advantage over their overwhelming SC Rim neighbors, allowing them not only withstand the enormous pressure, but even actively invade and dictate their will to their civilizational adversaries.
Nomads as the sanitarians of the Nature
If you would’ve asked a regular representative of any SC nation today what they think of the Eurasian Nomads, sadly the majority most likely wouldn’t say anything at all, as they’ve never even heard of it. Those few who know the word, would probably remember «bloody» Attila the Hun and murderous Genghis-Khan and the large hordes of cruel, brutal, genocidal invaders. Basically, the nomads are seen by most as unhuman, destructive force of nature, similar to hurricanes or other natural disasters.
Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.
Текст предоставлен ООО «ЛитРес».
Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на ЛитРес.
Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.